2023 Revolution Run

sábado, 31 de diciembre de 2022 7:59 (GMT-7) - Resultados finales

Información de la carrera
Deporte: Atletismo
Ubicación: Kearns, UT, Estados Unidos
Tipo de salida: Salida de series manual
Grupo de salida: Por distancia
Corredor: 36
Vueltas: Limitado por tiempo
Gestionado con: LENOVO 82BH
Programa: Webscorer PRO 6.0
Cronometraje por chip: RFID - LLRP
Actualizado: martes, 3 de enero de 2023 12:56 (GMT-7)
Organizado por: On Hill Events
Web de la carrera: http://www.onhillevents.com

Contacto del organizador

Utilice este formulario para enviar un correo electrónico al organizador.

Su nombre
Su dirección de correo electrónico
Confirmar la dirección de correo
Escriba al organizador
Enviar

  • Resultados de la carrera »
  • Most Laps in 5 Hours
  • Los tiempos de vuelta
Página / 10
Corredor por página:
Puesto Dorsal Nombre del corredor Asociación Categoría Edad Sexo El tiempo de vuelta
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0,00%100,00%32
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0,00%100,00%36
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0,00%100,00%37
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0,00%100,00%46
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0,00%100,00%47
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1,82%98,21%28
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1,82%98,21%34
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1,82%98,21%41
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3,64%96,49%26
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3,64%96,49%31
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3,64%96,49%42
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3,64%96,49%43
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3,64%96,49%48
14 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.8 +0:00.3+5,45%94,83%38
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9,09%91,67%27
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9,09%91,67%35
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9,09%91,67%39
18 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.2 +0:00.7+12,73%88,71%30
19 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.3 +0:00.8+14,55%87,30%49
20 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.7 +0:01.2+21,82%82,09%25
21 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:07.0 +0:01.5+27,27%78,57%44
22 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:08.0 +0:02.5+45,45%68,75%45
23 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:08.3 +0:02.8+50,91%66,27%40
24 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:09.0 +0:03.5+63,64%61,11%29
25 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:45.0 +0:39.5+718,18%12,22%33
26 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.2 +0:54.7+994,55%9,14%49
27 42 Christy Rand West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 47 F 1:00.5 +0:55.0+1000,00%9,09%18
28 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.6 +0:55.1+1001,82%9,08%45
29 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.7 +0:55.2+1003,64%9,06%42
30 42 Christy Rand West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 47 F 1:00.8 +0:55.3+1005,45%9,05%25
31 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.8 +0:55.3+1005,45%9,05%19
32 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.0 +0:55.5+1009,09%9,02%48
33 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.3 +0:55.8+1014,55%8,97%43
34 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.5 +0:56.0+1018,18%8,94%44
34 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.5 +0:56.0+1018,18%8,94%46
36 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.6 +0:56.1+1020,00%8,93%51
37 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.7 +0:56.2+1021,82%8,91%58
37 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 1:01.7 +0:56.2+1021,82%8,91%66
39 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.8 +0:56.3+1023,64%8,90%50
40 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:02.6 +0:57.1+1038,18%8,79%61
41 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 1:03.7 +0:58.2+1058,18%8,63%50
42 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:04.1 +0:58.6+1065,45%8,58%47
43 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 1:04.2 +0:58.7+1067,27%8,57%95
44 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:06.4 +1:00.9+1107,27%8,28%6
45 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:08.2 +1:02.7+1140,00%8,06%64
46 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 1:08.3 +1:02.8+1141,82%8,05%45
47 42 Christy Rand West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 47 F 1:13.4 +1:07.9+1234,55%7,49%24
48 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 1:15.7 +1:10.2+1276,36%7,27%61
49 81 Joshua Hansen   40 to 44 41 M 1:18.8 +1:13.3+1332,73%6,98%10
50 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 1:29.9 +1:24.4+1534,55%6,12%52
51 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:48.8 +1:43.3+1878,18%5,06%28
52 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 1:49.9 +1:44.4+1898,18%5,00%62
53 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:51.2 +1:45.7+1921,82%4,95%1
54 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:51.8 +1:46.3+1932,73%4,92%2
55 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:55.1 +1:49.6+1992,73%4,78%13
56 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:57.5 +1:52.0+2036,36%4,68%3
57 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:58.9 +1:53.4+2061,82%4,63%4
58 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 1:59.2 +1:53.7+2067,27%4,61%1
59 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:01.5 +1:56.0+2109,09%4,53%7
60 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.2 +1:56.7+2121,82%4,50%11
61 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.3 +1:56.8+2123,64%4,50%6
62 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.6 +1:57.1+2129,09%4,49%5
63 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 F 2:02.6 +1:57.1+2129,09%4,49%58
64 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:03.0 +1:57.5+2136,36%4,47%12
65 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 2:03.2 +1:57.7+2140,00%4,46%60
66 17 Cathi Gridley Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:03.2 +1:57.7+2140,00%4,46%80
67 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:03.5 +1:58.0+2145,45%4,45%1
68 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:05.3 +1:59.8+2178,18%4,39%14
69 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:05.4 +1:59.9+2180,00%4,39%3
70 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:05.9 +2:00.4+2189,09%4,37%13
71 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:06.0 +2:00.5+2190,91%4,37%2
72 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:06.7 +2:01.2+2203,64%4,34%4
73 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:06.8 +2:01.3+2205,45%4,34%5
74 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:07.0 +2:01.5+2209,09%4,33%7
75 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.0 +2:01.5+2209,09%4,33%8
76 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.1 +2:01.6+2210,91%4,33%10
77 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.1 +2:01.6+2210,91%4,33%9
78 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:07.3 +2:01.8+2214,55%4,32%6
79 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:07.6 +2:02.1+2220,00%4,31%4
80 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:07.8 +2:02.3+2223,64%4,30%18
81 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:08.2 +2:02.7+2230,91%4,29%15
82 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.3 +2:02.8+2232,73%4,29%19
83 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.5 +2:03.0+2236,36%4,28%3
84 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:08.7 +2:03.2+2240,00%4,27%56
85 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.8 +2:03.3+2241,82%4,27%6
86 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:08.9 +2:03.4+2243,64%4,27%53
87 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.0 +2:03.5+2245,45%4,26%11
88 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:09.1 +2:03.6+2247,27%4,26%17
89 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:09.3 +2:03.8+2250,91%4,25%2
90 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:09.4 +2:03.9+2252,73%4,25%3
91 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.4 +2:03.9+2252,73%4,25%8
92 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:09.6 +2:04.1+2256,36%4,24%43
93 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.6 +2:04.1+2256,36%4,24%6
94 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:09.8 +2:04.3+2260,00%4,24%5
95 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.0 +2:04.5+2263,64%4,23%8
96 46 Monte Riding West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:10.1 +2:04.6+2265,45%4,23%31
97 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.3 +2:04.8+2269,09%4,22%24
98 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270,91%4,22%7
99 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270,91%4,22%4
100 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270,91%4,22%14
101 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.7 +2:05.2+2276,36%4,21%22
102 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.7 +2:05.2+2276,36%4,21%40
103 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.1 +2:05.6+2283,64%4,20%5
104 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285,45%4,19%46
105 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285,45%4,19%16
105 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285,45%4,19%20
107 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.4 +2:05.9+2289,09%4,19%17
108 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.5 +2:06.0+2290,91%4,18%47
109 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.5 +2:06.0+2290,91%4,18%19
110 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292,73%4,18%13
110 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292,73%4,18%18
110 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292,73%4,18%23
113 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292,73%4,18%21
114 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.7 +2:06.2+2294,55%4,18%20
115 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.7 +2:06.2+2294,55%4,18%23
116 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296,36%4,17%17
116 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296,36%4,17%22
118 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296,36%4,17%14
119 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:11.9 +2:06.4+2298,18%4,17%23
120 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:12.0 +2:06.5+2300,00%4,17%15
121 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:12.1 +2:06.6+2301,82%4,16%21
122 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.2 +2:06.7+2303,64%4,16%11
123 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.3 +2:06.8+2305,45%4,16%32
124 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:12.4 +2:06.9+2307,27%4,15%23
125 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.4 +2:06.9+2307,27%4,15%48
126 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.5 +2:07.0+2309,09%4,15%28
127 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.6 +2:07.1+2310,91%4,15%21
128 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.7 +2:07.2+2312,73%4,14%15
129 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:12.8 +2:07.3+2314,55%4,14%8
130 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.9 +2:07.4+2316,36%4,14%41
131 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.9 +2:07.4+2316,36%4,14%29
132 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:13.1 +2:07.6+2320,00%4,13%9
133 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.2 +2:07.6+2320,00%4,13%19
134 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323,64%4,13%33
135 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323,64%4,13%24
136 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323,64%4,13%22
137 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323,64%4,13%9
138 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323,64%4,13%18
139 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:13.4 +2:07.9+2325,45%4,12%23
140 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:13.7 +2:08.2+2330,91%4,11%7
141 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:13.9 +2:08.4+2334,55%4,11%9
142 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.0 +2:08.5+2336,36%4,10%12
143 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.0 +2:08.5+2336,36%4,10%36
144 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.1 +2:08.6+2338,18%4,10%17
145 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.2 +2:08.6+2338,18%4,10%10
146 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.2 +2:08.7+2340,00%4,10%25
147 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.2 +2:08.7+2340,00%4,10%14
148 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:14.3 +2:08.8+2341,82%4,10%12
149 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:14.4 +2:08.9+2343,64%4,09%12
150 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.5 +2:09.0+2345,45%4,09%13
151 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:14.5 +2:09.0+2345,45%4,09%10
152 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:14.6 +2:09.1+2347,27%4,09%16
153 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.6 +2:09.1+2347,27%4,09%10
154 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.7 +2:09.2+2349,09%4,08%2
155 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:15.0 +2:09.5+2354,55%4,07%25
156 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:15.0 +2:09.5+2354,55%4,07%24
157 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358,18%4,07%12
158 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358,18%4,07%42
159 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358,18%4,07%1
160 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.3 +2:09.8+2360,00%4,07%38
161 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:15.3 +2:09.8+2360,00%4,07%120
162 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:15.7 +2:10.2+2367,27%4,05%9
163 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:15.7 +2:10.2+2367,27%4,05%13
164 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.9 +2:10.4+2370,91%4,05%34
165 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.0 +2:10.5+2372,73%4,04%20
166 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:16.0 +2:10.5+2372,73%4,04%6
167 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:16.1 +2:10.6+2374,55%4,04%26
168 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.1 +2:10.6+2374,55%4,04%6
169 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:16.3 +2:10.8+2378,18%4,04%102
170 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.4 +2:10.9+2380,00%4,03%8
171 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:16.5 +2:11.0+2381,82%4,03%37
172 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:17.1 +2:11.6+2392,73%4,01%13
173 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:17.2 +2:11.7+2394,55%4,01%12
174 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:17.5 +2:12.0+2400,00%4,00%10
175 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:17.5 +2:12.0+2400,00%4,00%121
176 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401,82%4,00%44
177 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401,82%4,00%11
178 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401,82%4,00%16
179 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:17.7 +2:12.2+2403,64%3,99%4
180 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.8 +2:12.3+2405,45%3,99%30
181 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.8 +2:12.3+2405,45%3,99%31
182 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:17.9 +2:12.4+2407,27%3,99%7
183 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:17.9 +2:12.4+2407,27%3,99%7
184 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:18.1 +2:12.6+2410,91%3,98%24
185 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:18.2 +2:12.7+2412,73%3,98%22
186 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:18.5 +2:13.0+2418,18%3,97%21
187 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:18.6 +2:13.1+2420,00%3,97%27
188 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:18.9 +2:13.4+2425,45%3,96%9
189 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.1 +2:13.6+2429,09%3,95%4
190 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.3 +2:13.8+2432,73%3,95%5
191 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.3 +2:13.8+2432,73%3,95%23
192 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434,55%3,95%5
193 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434,55%3,95%10
194 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434,55%3,95%4
194 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434,55%3,95%19
196 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.5 +2:14.0+2436,36%3,94%8
197 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:19.6 +2:14.1+2438,18%3,94%28
197 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:19.6 +2:14.1+2438,18%3,94%29
199 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.9 +2:14.4+2443,64%3,93%11
200 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:20.2 +2:14.7+2449,09%3,92%14
201 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:20.2 +2:14.7+2449,09%3,92%32
202 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:20.3 +2:14.8+2450,91%3,92%16
203 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:20.3 +2:14.8+2450,91%3,92%17
204 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:20.7 +2:15.2+2458,18%3,91%27
205 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:20.8 +2:15.3+2460,00%3,91%15
206 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:20.9 +2:15.4+2461,82%3,90%21
207 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:21.3 +2:15.8+2469,09%3,89%20
208 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:21.5 +2:16.0+2472,73%3,89%34
209 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:21.5 +2:16.0+2472,73%3,89%38
210 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:21.6 +2:16.1+2474,55%3,88%18
211 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:21.7 +2:16.2+2476,36%3,88%31
212 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:21.7 +2:16.2+2476,36%3,88%18
213 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:21.8 +2:16.3+2478,18%3,88%1
214 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:21.8 +2:16.3+2478,18%3,88%14
215 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:21.9 +2:16.4+2480,00%3,88%42
216 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:22.1 +2:16.6+2483,64%3,87%30
217 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:22.1 +2:16.6+2483,64%3,87%16
218 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:22.3 +2:16.8+2487,27%3,87%63
219 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:22.4 +2:16.9+2489,09%3,86%19
220 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:22.4 +2:16.9+2489,09%3,86%3
221 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:22.5 +2:17.0+2490,91%3,86%27
222 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:22.6 +2:17.1+2492,73%3,86%3
223 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:22.6 +2:17.1+2492,73%3,86%44
224 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:22.8 +2:17.3+2496,36%3,85%26
224 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:22.8 +2:17.3+2496,36%3,85%26
226 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:22.8 +2:17.4+2498,18%3,85%25
227 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501,82%3,84%33
228 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501,82%3,84%20
229 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501,82%3,84%41
230 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:23.4 +2:17.9+2507,27%3,84%36
231 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:23.6 +2:18.1+2510,91%3,83%28
232 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:23.6 +2:18.1+2510,91%3,83%38
233 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.6 +2:18.1+2510,91%3,83%26
234 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.7 +2:18.2+2512,73%3,83%37
234 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.7 +2:18.2+2512,73%3,83%50
236 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.8 +2:18.3+2514,55%3,82%29
237 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:23.8 +2:18.3+2514,55%3,82%26
238 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516,36%3,82%17
238 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516,36%3,82%35
240 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516,36%3,82%40
241 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.1 +2:18.6+2520,00%3,82%47
242 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.1 +2:18.6+2520,00%3,82%35
243 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.2 +2:18.7+2521,82%3,81%18
244 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.3 +2:18.8+2523,64%3,81%19
245 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:24.3 +2:18.8+2523,64%3,81%37
246 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.4 +2:18.9+2525,45%3,81%48
247 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.5 +2:19.0+2527,27%3,81%52
248 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.5 +2:19.0+2527,27%3,81%2
249 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.7 +2:19.2+2530,91%3,80%43
250 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.7 +2:19.2+2530,91%3,80%17
Página / 10
Corredor por página: