2022 Revolution Run

Saturday, January 1, 2022 8:01 AM (GMT-7) - Final results

Race info
Sport: Running
Location: Kearns, UT, United States
Start type: Individual start
Racers: 5
Laps: Time-limited
Timed on: HP Notebook
Timed with: Webscorer PRO 5.1
Chip timing: RFID - LLRP
Updated: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 3:01 PM (GMT-7)
Comments:  2  View all
Organized by: On Hill Events
Race website: http://www.onhillevents.com

Contact organizer

Use this form to send an email to the organizer.

Your name
Your email address
Confirm email address
Message to organizer
 Send

  • Race winners »
  • Most Laps in 5 Hours Male - Male 35 to 39
  • Lap times
Page / 2
Racers per page:
Place Bib Name Affiliation Category Age Gender Lap time
1 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 0:41.7 -+0.00%100.00%78
2 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:08.0 +1:26.3+206.95%32.58%22
3 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:10.0 +1:28.3+211.75%32.08%7
4 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:11.1 +1:29.4+214.39%31.81%19
5 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:11.3 +1:29.6+214.87%31.76%15
6 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:11.9 +1:30.2+216.31%31.61%16
7 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:12.3 +1:30.6+217.27%31.52%8
8 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:12.4 +1:30.7+217.51%31.50%25
9 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:12.5 +1:30.8+217.75%31.47%17
10 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:12.5 +1:30.8+217.75%31.47%27
11 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:12.6 +1:30.9+217.99%31.45%3
12 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:13.6 +1:31.9+220.38%31.21%11
13 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:13.7 +1:32.0+220.62%31.19%14
14 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:13.7 +1:32.0+220.62%31.19%18
15 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:14.1 +1:32.4+221.58%31.10%13
16 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:14.6 +1:32.9+222.78%30.98%20
17 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:15.0 +1:33.3+223.74%30.89%40
18 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:15.2 +1:33.5+224.22%30.84%6
19 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:15.7 +1:34.0+225.42%30.73%26
20 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:16.0 +1:34.3+226.14%30.66%21
21 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:16.3 +1:34.6+226.86%30.59%3
22 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:16.4 +1:34.7+227.10%30.57%9
23 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:16.9 +1:35.2+228.30%30.46%43
24 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:17.1 +1:35.4+228.78%30.42%10
25 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:17.6 +1:35.9+229.98%30.31%2
26 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:17.6 +1:36.0+230.22%30.31%5
27 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:17.8 +1:36.1+230.46%30.26%28
28 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:18.2 +1:36.5+231.41%30.17%6
29 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:18.3 +1:36.6+231.65%30.15%30
30 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:18.6 +1:36.9+232.37%30.09%44
31 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:18.7 +1:37.0+232.61%30.06%4
32 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:18.9 +1:37.2+233.09%30.02%29
33 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:19.3 +1:37.6+234.05%29.94%42
34 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:19.4 +1:37.7+234.29%29.91%1
35 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:19.4 +1:37.7+234.29%29.91%2
36 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:19.6 +1:37.9+234.77%29.87%34
37 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:20.0 +1:38.3+235.73%29.79%33
38 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:20.2 +1:38.6+236.45%29.74%41
39 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:21.2 +1:39.5+238.61%29.53%38
40 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:21.5 +1:39.8+239.33%29.47%4
41 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:21.7 +1:40.0+239.81%29.43%11
42 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:21.8 +1:40.1+240.05%29.41%39
43 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:21.9 +1:40.2+240.29%29.39%3
44 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:22.2 +1:40.5+241.01%29.32%47
45 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:22.7 +1:41.0+242.21%29.22%4
46 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:22.9 +1:41.2+242.69%29.18%37
47 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:23.0 +1:41.4+243.17%29.16%8
48 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:23.1 +1:41.4+243.17%29.14%45
49 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:23.7 +1:42.0+244.60%29.02%46
50 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:23.8 +1:42.1+244.84%29.00%39
51 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:24.0 +1:42.3+245.32%28.96%1
52 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:24.2 +1:42.5+245.80%28.92%9
53 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:24.2 +1:42.5+245.80%28.92%31
54 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:24.3 +1:42.6+246.04%28.90%14
55 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:24.4 +1:42.7+246.28%28.88%9
56 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:24.4 +1:42.7+246.28%28.88%2
57 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:24.6 +1:42.9+246.76%28.84%12
58 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:24.7 +1:43.0+247.00%28.82%13
59 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:24.8 +1:43.1+247.24%28.80%10
60 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:24.8 +1:43.1+247.24%28.80%32
61 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:25.0 +1:43.3+247.72%28.76%19
62 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:25.3 +1:43.7+248.68%28.70%12
63 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:25.4 +1:43.7+248.68%28.68%7
64 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:25.9 +1:44.2+249.88%28.58%1
65 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:26.8 +1:45.1+252.04%28.41%10
66 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:28.0 +1:46.3+254.92%28.18%11
67 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:28.4 +1:46.7+255.88%28.10%54
68 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:29.1 +1:47.4+257.55%27.97%17
69 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:29.4 +1:47.7+258.27%27.91%35
70 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:29.5 +1:47.8+258.51%27.89%6
71 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:30.2 +1:48.5+260.19%27.76%57
72 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:31.6 +1:50.0+263.79%27.51%53
73 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:31.7 +1:50.0+263.79%27.49%13
74 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:32.1 +1:50.4+264.75%27.42%8
75 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:32.4 +1:50.7+265.47%27.36%62
76 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:32.8 +1:51.1+266.43%27.29%19
77 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:32.9 +1:51.2+266.67%27.27%69
78 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:33.1 +1:51.4+267.15%27.24%61
79 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:33.2 +1:51.5+267.39%27.22%76
80 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:33.3 +1:51.6+267.63%27.20%22
81 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:33.6 +1:51.9+268.35%27.15%7
82 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:33.6 +1:51.9+268.35%27.15%22
83 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:33.7 +1:52.0+268.59%27.13%65
84 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:33.8 +1:52.1+268.82%27.11%58
85 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:33.9 +1:52.2+269.06%27.10%5
86 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:33.9 +1:52.2+269.06%27.10%26
87 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:34.3 +1:52.6+270.02%27.03%34
88 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:34.3 +1:52.6+270.02%27.03%14
89 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:34.5 +1:52.8+270.50%26.99%52
90 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:34.5 +1:52.8+270.50%26.99%11
91 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:34.5 +1:52.8+270.50%26.99%63
92 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:34.7 +1:53.0+270.98%26.96%29
93 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:35.1 +1:53.4+271.94%26.89%18
94 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:35.4 +1:53.7+272.66%26.83%21
95 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:35.4 +1:53.7+272.66%26.83%15
96 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:35.8 +1:54.1+273.62%26.77%23
97 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:35.8 +1:54.1+273.62%26.77%15
98 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:35.9 +1:54.2+273.86%26.75%71
99 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:36.0 +1:54.4+274.34%26.73%10
100 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:36.1 +1:54.4+274.34%26.71%21
101 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:36.7 +1:55.0+275.78%26.61%70
102 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:36.8 +1:55.1+276.02%26.59%46
103 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:36.8 +1:55.1+276.02%26.59%14
104 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:37.0 +1:55.3+276.50%26.56%32
105 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:37.0 +1:55.3+276.50%26.56%9
106 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:37.1 +1:55.4+276.74%26.54%7
107 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:37.2 +1:55.5+276.98%26.53%73
108 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:37.3 +1:55.6+277.22%26.51%6
109 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:37.9 +1:56.2+278.66%26.41%23
110 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:37.9 +1:56.2+278.66%26.41%28
111 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.0 +1:56.3+278.90%26.39%67
112 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.1 +1:56.4+279.14%26.38%74
113 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.1 +1:56.4+279.14%26.38%8
114 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.2 +1:56.5+279.38%26.36%1
115 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.2 +1:56.5+279.38%26.36%18
116 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.2 +1:56.5+279.38%26.36%5
117 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.2 +1:56.5+279.38%26.36%59
118 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.3 +1:56.6+279.62%26.34%4
119 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.4 +1:56.7+279.86%26.33%17
120 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.5 +1:56.8+280.10%26.31%68
121 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.6 +1:56.9+280.34%26.29%20
122 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.7 +1:57.0+280.58%26.28%17
123 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.8 +1:57.1+280.82%26.26%30
124 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:38.9 +1:57.2+281.06%26.24%46
125 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:39.2 +1:57.5+281.77%26.19%13
126 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:39.3 +1:57.6+282.01%26.18%20
127 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:39.3 +1:57.6+282.01%26.18%75
128 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:39.4 +1:57.7+282.25%26.16%64
129 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:40.2 +1:58.5+284.17%26.03%25
130 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:40.3 +1:58.6+284.41%26.01%16
131 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:40.3 +1:58.6+284.41%26.01%16
132 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:40.4 +1:58.7+284.65%26.00%3
133 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:40.5 +1:58.8+284.89%25.98%26
134 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:40.5 +1:58.8+284.89%25.98%60
135 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:40.6 +1:58.9+285.13%25.97%19
136 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:41.0 +1:59.3+286.09%25.90%56
137 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:41.2 +1:59.5+286.57%25.87%72
138 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:41.4 +1:59.7+287.05%25.84%35
139 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:41.5 +1:59.8+287.29%25.82%18
140 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:41.6 +1:59.9+287.53%25.80%21
141 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:41.8 +2:00.1+288.01%25.77%89
142 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:41.8 +2:00.1+288.01%25.77%2
143 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:42.1 +2:00.4+288.73%25.72%31
144 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:42.1 +2:00.4+288.73%25.72%36
145 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:42.4 +2:00.7+289.45%25.68%38
146 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:42.7 +2:01.0+290.17%25.63%30
147 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:42.8 +2:01.1+290.41%25.61%22
148 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:43.7 +2:02.0+292.57%25.47%37
149 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:43.7 +2:02.0+292.57%25.47%25
150 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:43.8 +2:02.1+292.81%25.46%76
151 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:44.2 +2:02.5+293.76%25.40%25
152 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:44.2 +2:02.6+294.00%25.40%42
153 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:44.3 +2:02.6+294.00%25.38%20
154 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:44.3 +2:02.6+294.00%25.38%27
155 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:44.8 +2:03.1+295.20%25.30%27
156 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:45.2 +2:03.6+296.40%25.24%33
157 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:45.4 +2:03.7+296.64%25.21%80
158 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:45.6 +2:03.9+297.12%25.18%91
159 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:45.7 +2:04.0+297.36%25.17%92
160 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:46.8 +2:05.1+300.00%25.00%18
161 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:47.1 +2:05.4+300.72%24.96%90
162 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:47.2 +2:05.5+300.96%24.94%82
163 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:47.7 +2:06.0+302.16%24.87%38
164 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:47.7 +2:06.0+302.16%24.87%39
165 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:47.8 +2:06.1+302.40%24.85%40
166 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:47.8 +2:06.1+302.40%24.85%39
167 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:47.8 +2:06.1+302.40%24.85%31
168 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:48.6 +2:06.9+304.32%24.73%4
169 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:48.7 +2:07.0+304.56%24.72%3
170 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:48.7 +2:07.0+304.56%24.72%28
171 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:48.8 +2:07.1+304.80%24.70%14
172 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:48.9 +2:07.2+305.04%24.69%38
173 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:48.9 +2:07.2+305.04%24.69%40
174 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:49.0 +2:07.3+305.28%24.67%34
175 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:49.4 +2:07.7+306.24%24.62%5
176 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:49.7 +2:08.0+306.95%24.57%15
177 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:50.2 +2:08.5+308.15%24.50%41
178 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:50.2 +2:08.5+308.15%24.50%16
179 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:50.5 +2:08.9+309.11%24.46%44
180 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:50.9 +2:09.2+309.83%24.40%84
181 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:51.1 +2:09.4+310.31%24.37%19
182 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:51.4 +2:09.7+311.03%24.33%13
183 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:51.5 +2:09.8+311.27%24.31%41
184 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:51.8 +2:10.1+311.99%24.27%2
185 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:51.8 +2:10.1+311.99%24.27%17
186 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:52.0 +2:10.3+312.47%24.24%64
187 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:52.2 +2:10.5+312.95%24.22%7
188 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:52.3 +2:10.6+313.19%24.20%54
189 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:52.3 +2:10.6+313.19%24.20%9
190 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:52.4 +2:10.7+313.43%24.19%44
191 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:52.4 +2:10.7+313.43%24.19%6
192 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:52.5 +2:10.8+313.67%24.17%88
193 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:52.8 +2:11.1+314.39%24.13%45
194 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:53.0 +2:11.3+314.87%24.10%86
195 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:53.1 +2:11.4+315.11%24.09%43
196 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:53.2 +2:11.5+315.35%24.08%8
197 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:53.6 +2:11.9+316.31%24.02%32
198 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:53.6 +2:11.9+316.31%24.02%24
199 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:53.9 +2:12.2+317.03%23.98%33
200 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:54.2 +2:12.5+317.75%23.94%37
201 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:54.3 +2:12.6+317.99%23.92%46
202 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:54.6 +2:12.9+318.71%23.88%25
203 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:54.7 +2:13.0+318.94%23.87%29
204 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:54.7 +2:13.0+318.94%23.87%36
205 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:55.1 +2:13.4+319.90%23.81%38
206 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:55.2 +2:13.5+320.14%23.80%42
207 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:55.4 +2:13.7+320.62%23.77%10
208 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:55.6 +2:13.9+321.10%23.75%66
209 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:56.1 +2:14.4+322.30%23.68%24
210 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:56.2 +2:14.5+322.54%23.67%30
211 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:56.3 +2:14.6+322.78%23.65%29
212 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:56.3 +2:14.6+322.78%23.65%43
213 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:56.5 +2:14.8+323.26%23.63%27
214 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:56.6 +2:14.9+323.50%23.61%47
215 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:56.6 +2:14.9+323.50%23.61%35
216 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:57.1 +2:15.4+324.70%23.55%29
217 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:57.9 +2:16.2+326.62%23.44%98
218 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:58.1 +2:16.4+327.10%23.41%70
219 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:58.3 +2:16.6+327.58%23.39%12
220 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 2:58.9 +2:17.2+329.02%23.31%24
221 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 2:59.2 +2:17.5+329.74%23.27%31
222 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:00.1 +2:18.4+331.89%23.15%30
223 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:01.4 +2:19.7+335.01%22.99%35
224 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:02.1 +2:20.4+336.69%22.90%41
225 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:02.1 +2:20.4+336.69%22.90%95
226 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:02.6 +2:20.9+337.89%22.84%97
227 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:02.7 +2:21.0+338.13%22.82%96
228 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:02.9 +2:21.2+338.61%22.80%94
229 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:02.9 +2:21.2+338.61%22.80%1
230 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:03.2 +2:21.5+339.33%22.76%73
231 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:05.5 +2:23.8+344.84%22.48%75
232 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:05.7 +2:24.0+345.32%22.46%48
233 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:05.8 +2:24.1+345.56%22.44%23
234 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:05.9 +2:24.2+345.80%22.43%53
235 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:06.5 +2:24.8+347.24%22.36%46
236 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:06.6 +2:24.9+347.48%22.35%85
237 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:06.9 +2:25.2+348.20%22.31%26
238 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:07.1 +2:25.4+348.68%22.29%65
239 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:07.6 +2:25.9+349.88%22.23%36
240 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:08.9 +2:27.2+353.00%22.08%28
241 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:09.4 +2:27.7+354.20%22.02%42
242 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:09.4 +2:27.7+354.20%22.02%49
243 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:10.4 +2:28.7+356.59%21.90%52
244 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:10.7 +2:29.0+357.31%21.87%54
245 63 James, Michael Spanish Fork - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:11.9 +2:30.2+360.19%21.73%12
246 86 Mills, Brandon Orem - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:12.5 +2:30.8+361.63%21.66%15
247 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:12.5 +2:30.9+361.87%21.66%55
248 121 Taylor, Brian Pleasant Grove - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:12.7 +2:31.0+362.11%21.64%31
249 28 Flores, Robert West Valley City - UT  Male 35 to 39 36 M 3:12.8 +2:31.1+362.35%21.63%51
250 47 Hammond, Matt Salt Lake City - UT  Male 35 to 39 37 M 3:13.8 +2:32.1+364.75%21.52%12
Page / 2
Racers per page:
  • Comments (2)