2025 Revolution Run

Wednesday, January 1, 2025 8:00 AM (GMT-7) - Final results

Race info
Sport: Running
Location: Kearns, UT, United States
View on map
Start type: Individual start
Racers: 14
Laps: Time-limited
Category results: Exclude top 3 overall
Timed on: LENOVO 82BH
Timed with: Webscorer PRO 7.2
Chip timing: RFID - LLRP
RFID reader: Impinj
Updated: Friday, January 17, 2025 2:54 PM (GMT-7)
Organized by: On Hill Events
Race website: http://www.onhillevents.com

Contact organizer

Use this form to send an email to the organizer.

Your name
Your email address
Confirm email address
Message to organizer
Send

  • Race winners »
  • Half Marathon Male
  • Lap times
Page / 2
Racers per page:
Place Bib Name Affiliation Category Age Gender Lap time
1 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 0:01.5 -+0.00%100.00%49
2 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.0 +0:04.5+300.00%25.00%20
3 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.0 +0:04.5+300.00%25.00%19
4 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.1 +0:04.6+306.67%24.59%23
5 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.1 +0:04.6+306.67%24.59%15
6 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.1 +0:04.6+306.67%24.59%18
7 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.1 +0:04.6+306.67%24.59%11
8 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.1 +0:04.6+306.67%24.59%16
9 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.2 +0:04.7+313.33%24.19%9
10 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.2 +0:04.7+313.33%24.19%8
11 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.2 +0:04.7+313.33%24.19%17
12 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.4 +0:04.9+326.67%23.44%14
13 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:06.4 +0:04.9+326.67%23.44%10
14 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:07.9 +0:06.4+426.67%18.99%13
15 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:07.9 +0:06.4+426.67%18.99%4
16 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:08.5 +0:07.0+466.67%17.65%2
17 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:09.4 +0:07.9+526.67%15.96%7
18 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:10.5 +0:09.0+600.00%14.29%6
19 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:10.8 +0:09.3+620.00%13.89%12
20 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:12.4 +0:10.9+726.67%12.10%21
21 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:12.6 +0:11.1+740.00%11.90%3
22 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:15.1 +0:13.6+906.67%9.93%1
23 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:26.9 +0:25.4+1693.33%5.58%22
24 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 0:39.4 +0:37.9+2526.67%3.81%5
25 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 0:46.4 +0:44.9+2993.33%3.23%38
26 168 Cevan Skinner Orem, UT  45 to 49 47 M 0:55.0 +0:53.5+3566.67%2.73%46
27 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 1:08.6 +1:07.1+4473.33%2.19%47
28 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 1:19.1 +1:17.6+5173.33%1.90%46
29 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 1:21.7 +1:20.2+5346.67%1.84%44
30 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 1:31.9 +1:30.4+6026.67%1.63%1
31 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 1:46.1 +1:44.6+6973.33%1.41%48
32 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 1:51.2 +1:49.7+7313.33%1.35%49
33 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 1:59.2 +1:57.7+7846.67%1.26%48
34 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:00.1 +1:58.6+7906.67%1.25%47
35 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:01.5 +2:00.0+8000.00%1.23%49
36 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:01.8 +2:00.3+8020.00%1.23%46
37 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:02.1 +2:00.6+8040.00%1.23%27
38 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:02.8 +2:01.3+8086.67%1.22%29
39 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:03.4 +2:01.9+8126.67%1.22%47
40 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:03.8 +2:02.3+8153.33%1.21%44
41 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:04.0 +2:02.5+8166.67%1.21%41
42 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:04.0 +2:02.5+8166.67%1.21%46
43 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:04.1 +2:02.6+8173.33%1.21%49
44 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:04.2 +2:02.7+8180.00%1.21%10
45 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:04.4 +2:02.9+8193.33%1.21%26
46 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:04.9 +2:03.4+8226.67%1.20%28
47 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.1 +2:03.6+8240.00%1.20%35
48 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.2 +2:03.7+8246.67%1.20%13
49 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.3 +2:03.8+8253.33%1.20%18
50 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.3 +2:03.8+8253.33%1.20%36
51 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.4 +2:03.9+8260.00%1.20%32
52 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.4 +2:03.9+8260.00%1.20%21
53 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.5 +2:04.0+8266.67%1.20%25
54 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.6 +2:04.1+8273.33%1.19%24
55 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.8 +2:04.3+8286.67%1.19%14
56 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.8 +2:04.3+8286.67%1.19%17
57 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.8 +2:04.3+8286.67%1.19%23
58 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.9 +2:04.4+8293.33%1.19%37
59 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.9 +2:04.4+8293.33%1.19%31
60 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:05.9 +2:04.4+8293.33%1.19%11
61 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.0 +2:04.5+8300.00%1.19%39
62 168 Cevan Skinner Orem, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:06.0 +2:04.5+8300.00%1.19%19
63 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:06.0 +2:04.5+8300.00%1.19%48
64 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:06.1 +2:04.6+8306.67%1.19%42
65 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.2 +2:04.7+8313.33%1.19%30
66 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.2 +2:04.7+8313.33%1.19%12
67 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.3 +2:04.8+8320.00%1.19%38
68 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.3 +2:04.8+8320.00%1.19%20
69 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.4 +2:04.9+8326.67%1.19%34
70 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.7 +2:05.2+8346.67%1.18%16
71 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.7 +2:05.2+8346.67%1.18%40
72 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:06.8 +2:05.3+8353.33%1.18%33
73 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:06.9 +2:05.4+8360.00%1.18%43
74 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:06.9 +2:05.4+8360.00%1.18%49
75 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.0 +2:05.5+8366.67%1.18%42
76 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:07.0 +2:05.5+8366.67%1.18%45
77 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.2 +2:05.7+8380.00%1.18%19
78 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.2 +2:05.7+8380.00%1.18%9
79 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:07.5 +2:06.0+8400.00%1.18%37
80 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.6 +2:06.1+8406.67%1.18%22
81 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.6 +2:06.1+8406.67%1.18%15
82 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:07.6 +2:06.1+8406.67%1.18%43
83 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:07.7 +2:06.2+8413.33%1.17%44
84 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:08.0 +2:06.5+8433.33%1.17%45
85 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:08.4 +2:06.9+8460.00%1.17%22
86 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:08.7 +2:07.2+8480.00%1.17%42
87 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:08.7 +2:07.2+8480.00%1.17%31
88 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:08.7 +2:07.2+8480.00%1.17%8
89 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:08.9 +2:07.4+8493.33%1.16%41
90 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:09.0 +2:07.5+8500.00%1.16%38
91 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:09.1 +2:07.6+8506.67%1.16%40
92 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:09.1 +2:07.6+8506.67%1.16%43
93 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.1 +2:07.6+8506.67%1.16%37
94 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:09.1 +2:07.6+8506.67%1.16%4
95 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.3 +2:07.8+8520.00%1.16%4
96 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:09.3 +2:07.8+8520.00%1.16%46
97 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.5 +2:08.0+8533.33%1.16%8
98 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.6 +2:08.1+8540.00%1.16%30
99 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:09.6 +2:08.1+8540.00%1.16%45
100 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:09.6 +2:08.1+8540.00%1.16%35
101 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:09.7 +2:08.2+8546.67%1.16%41
102 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.8 +2:08.3+8553.33%1.16%23
102 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:09.8 +2:08.3+8553.33%1.16%24
104 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:10.0 +2:08.5+8566.67%1.15%37
105 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.1 +2:08.6+8573.33%1.15%16
106 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:10.3 +2:08.8+8586.67%1.15%47
107 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.3 +2:08.8+8586.67%1.15%38
108 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.5 +2:09.0+8600.00%1.15%19
108 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.5 +2:09.0+8600.00%1.15%21
110 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.7 +2:09.2+8613.33%1.15%28
111 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:10.8 +2:09.3+8620.00%1.15%7
112 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:10.8 +2:09.3+8620.00%1.15%20
113 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:10.8 +2:09.3+8620.00%1.15%38
114 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:10.9 +2:09.4+8626.67%1.15%12
115 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.0 +2:09.5+8633.33%1.15%35
116 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:11.1 +2:09.6+8640.00%1.14%44
117 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:11.1 +2:09.6+8640.00%1.14%32
118 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.2 +2:09.7+8646.67%1.14%36
119 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:11.2 +2:09.7+8646.67%1.14%7
120 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:11.2 +2:09.7+8646.67%1.14%33
121 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.3 +2:09.8+8653.33%1.14%7
121 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.3 +2:09.8+8653.33%1.14%33
123 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.4 +2:09.9+8660.00%1.14%5
123 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.4 +2:09.9+8660.00%1.14%10
125 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:11.5 +2:10.0+8666.67%1.14%34
126 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.6 +2:10.1+8673.33%1.14%27
126 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.6 +2:10.1+8673.33%1.14%39
128 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:11.6 +2:10.1+8673.33%1.14%4
129 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:11.7 +2:10.2+8680.00%1.14%3
130 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:11.7 +2:10.2+8680.00%1.14%10
131 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:11.8 +2:10.3+8686.67%1.14%5
132 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.9 +2:10.4+8693.33%1.14%11
132 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.9 +2:10.4+8693.33%1.14%17
132 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:11.9 +2:10.4+8693.33%1.14%25
135 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:12.0 +2:10.5+8700.00%1.14%9
136 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:12.1 +2:10.6+8706.67%1.14%8
137 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:12.2 +2:10.7+8713.33%1.13%5
138 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:12.2 +2:10.7+8713.33%1.13%12
139 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:12.3 +2:10.8+8720.00%1.13%6
140 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:12.5 +2:11.0+8733.33%1.13%6
141 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:12.5 +2:11.0+8733.33%1.13%28
142 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:12.6 +2:11.1+8740.00%1.13%6
143 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:12.6 +2:11.1+8740.00%1.13%17
144 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:12.8 +2:11.3+8753.33%1.13%36
145 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:12.8 +2:11.3+8753.33%1.13%13
146 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:12.9 +2:11.4+8760.00%1.13%15
147 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:13.2 +2:11.7+8780.00%1.13%9
148 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:13.4 +2:11.9+8793.33%1.12%3
149 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.4 +2:11.9+8793.33%1.12%27
150 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:13.4 +2:11.9+8793.33%1.12%26
151 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:13.4 +2:11.9+8793.33%1.12%3
152 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.5 +2:12.0+8800.00%1.12%15
153 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.6 +2:12.1+8806.67%1.12%16
154 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.6 +2:12.1+8806.67%1.12%20
155 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:13.6 +2:12.1+8806.67%1.12%4
156 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:13.8 +2:12.3+8820.00%1.12%27
157 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.8 +2:12.3+8820.00%1.12%23
158 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.8 +2:12.3+8820.00%1.12%13
159 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:13.9 +2:12.4+8826.67%1.12%19
160 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:14.0 +2:12.5+8833.33%1.12%29
161 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:14.1 +2:12.6+8840.00%1.12%30
162 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.1 +2:12.6+8840.00%1.12%2
163 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:14.3 +2:12.8+8853.33%1.12%25
164 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:14.3 +2:12.8+8853.33%1.12%31
165 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:14.3 +2:12.8+8853.33%1.12%2
166 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:14.4 +2:12.9+8860.00%1.12%18
167 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.4 +2:12.9+8860.00%1.12%14
168 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.4 +2:12.9+8860.00%1.12%36
169 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.4 +2:13.0+8866.67%1.12%33
170 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:14.6 +2:13.1+8873.33%1.11%34
171 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.6 +2:13.1+8873.33%1.11%22
172 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:14.8 +2:13.3+8886.67%1.11%26
173 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:15.0 +2:13.5+8900.00%1.11%48
174 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.1 +2:13.6+8906.67%1.11%18
175 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:15.3 +2:13.8+8920.00%1.11%29
176 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.3 +2:13.8+8920.00%1.11%24
177 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:15.4 +2:13.9+8926.67%1.11%2
178 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.5 +2:14.0+8933.33%1.11%31
179 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:15.6 +2:14.0+8933.33%1.11%3
180 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:15.7 +2:14.2+8946.67%1.11%35
181 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.7 +2:14.2+8946.67%1.11%35
182 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.9 +2:14.4+8960.00%1.10%30
183 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:15.9 +2:14.4+8960.00%1.10%34
184 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:16.1 +2:14.6+8973.33%1.10%32
185 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:16.2 +2:14.7+8980.00%1.10%29
186 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:16.4 +2:14.9+8993.33%1.10%25
187 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:16.4 +2:14.9+8993.33%1.10%28
188 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:16.5 +2:15.0+9000.00%1.10%2
189 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:16.5 +2:15.0+9000.00%1.10%23
190 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:16.9 +2:15.4+9026.67%1.10%25
191 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:17.1 +2:15.6+9040.00%1.09%11
192 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:17.3 +2:15.8+9053.33%1.09%1
193 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:17.3 +2:15.8+9053.33%1.09%39
194 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:17.3 +2:15.8+9053.33%1.09%30
195 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:17.7 +2:16.2+9080.00%1.09%40
196 29 Isaac Chapman Salt Lake City, UT  20 to 24 20 M 2:17.8 +2:16.3+9086.67%1.09%1
197 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:17.9 +2:16.4+9093.33%1.09%21
198 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:17.9 +2:16.4+9093.33%1.09%24
199 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:18.1 +2:16.6+9106.67%1.09%20
200 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:18.1 +2:16.6+9106.67%1.09%25
201 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:18.2 +2:16.7+9113.33%1.09%48
202 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:18.4 +2:16.9+9126.67%1.08%47
203 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:18.6 +2:17.1+9140.00%1.08%27
204 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:19.1 +2:17.6+9173.33%1.08%42
205 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:19.2 +2:17.7+9180.00%1.08%43
206 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:19.2 +2:17.7+9180.00%1.08%45
207 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:19.6 +2:18.1+9206.67%1.07%21
208 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:19.7 +2:18.2+9213.33%1.07%40
209 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:19.8 +2:18.3+9220.00%1.07%22
210 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:19.8 +2:18.3+9220.00%1.07%12
211 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:20.0 +2:18.5+9233.33%1.07%44
212 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:20.1 +2:18.6+9240.00%1.07%14
213 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:20.3 +2:18.8+9253.33%1.07%31
214 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:20.3 +2:18.8+9253.33%1.07%5
215 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:20.4 +2:18.9+9260.00%1.07%19
216 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:20.5 +2:19.0+9266.67%1.07%28
217 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:20.6 +2:19.1+9273.33%1.07%28
218 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:20.9 +2:19.4+9293.33%1.06%22
219 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:20.9 +2:19.4+9293.33%1.06%29
220 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:20.9 +2:19.4+9293.33%1.06%47
221 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.0 +2:19.5+9300.00%1.06%2
222 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.0 +2:19.5+9300.00%1.06%24
223 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.0 +2:19.5+9300.00%1.06%49
224 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:21.1 +2:19.6+9306.67%1.06%47
225 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.2 +2:19.7+9313.33%1.06%15
226 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:21.3 +2:19.8+9320.00%1.06%7
227 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:21.3 +2:19.8+9320.00%1.06%1
228 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:21.3 +2:19.8+9320.00%1.06%2
229 61 Brent Gowans Riverton, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:21.6 +2:20.1+9340.00%1.06%24
230 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.7 +2:20.2+9346.67%1.06%34
231 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:21.7 +2:20.2+9346.67%1.06%9
232 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:21.8 +2:20.3+9353.33%1.06%45
233 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:21.8 +2:20.3+9353.33%1.06%43
234 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.0 +2:20.5+9366.67%1.06%38
235 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.2 +2:20.7+9380.00%1.05%41
236 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:22.2 +2:20.7+9380.00%1.05%1
237 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:22.2 +2:20.7+9380.00%1.05%8
238 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.3 +2:20.8+9386.67%1.05%17
239 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.3 +2:20.8+9386.67%1.05%7
240 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.4 +2:20.9+9393.33%1.05%3
241 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:22.4 +2:20.9+9393.33%1.05%10
242 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:22.6 +2:21.1+9406.67%1.05%32
243 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:22.6 +2:21.1+9406.67%1.05%11
244 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:22.9 +2:21.4+9426.67%1.05%18
245 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:22.9 +2:21.4+9426.67%1.05%37
246 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:22.9 +2:21.4+9426.67%1.05%41
247 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:23.1 +2:21.6+9440.00%1.05%42
248 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:23.1 +2:21.6+9440.00%1.05%40
249 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:23.2 +2:21.7+9446.67%1.05%41
250 2 Manoel Almeida Neto Clearfield, UT  45 to 49 45 M 2:23.2 +2:21.7+9446.67%1.05%1
251 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:23.2 +2:21.7+9446.67%1.05%33
252 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:23.2 +2:21.7+9446.67%1.05%13
253 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:23.3 +2:21.8+9453.33%1.05%7
254 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:23.3 +2:21.8+9453.33%1.05%48
255 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:23.4 +2:21.9+9460.00%1.05%3
256 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:23.4 +2:21.9+9460.00%1.05%11
257 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:23.6 +2:22.1+9473.33%1.04%18
258 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:23.6 +2:22.1+9473.33%1.04%43
259 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:23.8 +2:22.3+9486.67%1.04%46
260 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:23.9 +2:22.4+9493.33%1.04%8
261 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:24.0 +2:22.5+9500.00%1.04%4
262 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:24.1 +2:22.6+9506.67%1.04%44
263 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:24.1 +2:22.6+9506.67%1.04%9
264 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:24.3 +2:22.8+9520.00%1.04%10
265 92 Shad Hymas Magna, UT  15 to 19 17 M 2:24.6 +2:23.1+9540.00%1.04%26
266 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:25.0 +2:23.5+9566.67%1.03%42
267 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:25.1 +2:23.6+9573.33%1.03%6
268 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:25.2 +2:23.7+9580.00%1.03%8
269 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:25.2 +2:23.7+9580.00%1.03%25
270 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:25.2 +2:23.7+9580.00%1.03%7
271 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:25.3 +2:23.8+9586.67%1.03%1
272 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:25.4 +2:23.9+9593.33%1.03%32
273 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:25.6 +2:24.1+9606.67%1.03%11
274 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:25.6 +2:24.1+9606.67%1.03%4
275 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:25.7 +2:24.2+9613.33%1.03%18
276 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:25.8 +2:24.3+9620.00%1.03%2
277 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:26.0 +2:24.5+9633.33%1.03%37
278 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:26.1 +2:24.6+9640.00%1.03%29
279 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:26.1 +2:24.6+9640.00%1.03%6
280 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:26.3 +2:24.8+9653.33%1.03%6
281 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:26.3 +2:24.8+9653.33%1.03%5
282 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:26.3 +2:24.8+9653.33%1.03%17
283 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:26.3 +2:24.8+9653.33%1.03%5
284 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:26.4 +2:24.9+9660.00%1.02%19
285 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:26.7 +2:25.2+9680.00%1.02%45
286 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:26.9 +2:25.4+9693.33%1.02%31
287 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:27.0 +2:25.5+9700.00%1.02%24
288 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:27.3 +2:25.8+9720.00%1.02%9
289 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:27.4 +2:25.9+9726.67%1.02%14
290 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:27.4 +2:25.9+9726.67%1.02%39
291 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:27.4 +2:25.9+9726.67%1.02%38
292 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:27.4 +2:25.9+9726.67%1.02%6
293 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:27.5 +2:26.0+9733.33%1.02%13
294 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:27.6 +2:26.1+9740.00%1.02%11
295 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:27.7 +2:26.2+9746.67%1.02%8
296 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:27.7 +2:26.2+9746.67%1.02%15
297 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:27.7 +2:26.2+9746.67%1.02%10
298 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:27.8 +2:26.3+9753.33%1.01%33
299 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:27.8 +2:26.3+9753.33%1.01%35
300 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:27.9 +2:26.4+9760.00%1.01%40
301 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:27.9 +2:26.4+9760.00%1.01%26
302 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:28.0 +2:26.5+9766.67%1.01%16
303 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:28.2 +2:26.7+9780.00%1.01%17
304 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:28.3 +2:26.8+9786.67%1.01%39
305 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:28.5 +2:27.0+9800.00%1.01%12
306 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:28.5 +2:27.0+9800.00%1.01%28
307 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:28.6 +2:27.1+9806.67%1.01%18
308 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:28.9 +2:27.4+9826.67%1.01%22
309 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:28.9 +2:27.4+9826.67%1.01%36
310 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:28.9 +2:27.4+9826.67%1.01%29
311 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:29.0 +2:27.5+9833.33%1.01%32
312 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:29.1 +2:27.6+9840.00%1.01%21
313 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:29.1 +2:27.6+9840.00%1.01%13
314 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:29.3 +2:27.8+9853.33%1.00%12
315 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:29.4 +2:27.9+9860.00%1.00%19
316 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:29.5 +2:28.0+9866.67%1.00%23
317 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:29.6 +2:28.1+9873.33%1.00%11
318 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:29.8 +2:28.3+9886.67%1.00%7
319 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:30.0 +2:28.5+9900.00%1.00%5
320 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:30.0 +2:28.5+9900.00%1.00%27
321 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:30.3 +2:28.8+9920.00%1.00%49
322 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:30.4 +2:28.9+9926.67%1.00%21
323 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:30.5 +2:29.0+9933.33%1.00%9
324 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:30.5 +2:29.0+9933.33%1.00%10
325 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:30.6 +2:29.1+9940.00%1.00%15
326 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:30.7 +2:29.2+9946.67%1.00%27
327 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:30.8 +2:29.3+9953.33%0.99%8
328 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:30.8 +2:29.3+9953.33%0.99%1
329 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:30.9 +2:29.4+9960.00%0.99%9
330 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:30.9 +2:29.4+9960.00%0.99%14
331 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:31.0 +2:29.4+9960.00%0.99%39
332 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:31.0 +2:29.5+9966.67%0.99%32
333 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:31.0 +2:29.5+9966.67%0.99%21
334 57 Kaleb Franklin Clearfield, UT  25 to 29 26 M 2:31.1 +2:29.6+9973.33%0.99%49
335 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:31.2 +2:29.7+9980.00%0.99%24
336 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:31.3 +2:29.8+9986.67%0.99%3
337 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:31.3 +2:29.8+9986.67%0.99%26
338 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:31.3 +2:29.8+9986.67%0.99%16
339 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:31.5 +2:30.0+10000.00%0.99%42
340 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:31.6 +2:30.1+10006.67%0.99%34
341 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:31.6 +2:30.1+10006.67%0.99%12
342 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:31.7 +2:30.2+10013.33%0.99%23
343 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:31.7 +2:30.2+10013.33%0.99%4
344 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:31.9 +2:30.4+10026.67%0.99%13
345 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:32.0 +2:30.5+10033.33%0.99%7
346 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:32.0 +2:30.6+10040.00%0.99%9
347 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:32.1 +2:30.6+10040.00%0.99%16
348 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:32.2 +2:30.7+10046.67%0.99%30
349 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:32.2 +2:30.7+10046.67%0.99%46
350 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:32.3 +2:30.8+10053.33%0.98%17
351 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:32.3 +2:30.8+10053.33%0.98%24
352 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:32.4 +2:30.9+10060.00%0.98%34
353 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:32.5 +2:31.0+10066.67%0.98%30
354 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:32.6 +2:31.1+10073.33%0.98%6
355 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:32.7 +2:31.2+10080.00%0.98%31
356 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:32.9 +2:31.4+10093.33%0.98%3
357 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:32.9 +2:31.4+10093.33%0.98%29
358 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:32.9 +2:31.4+10093.33%0.98%5
359 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:33.0 +2:31.5+10100.00%0.98%18
360 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:33.0 +2:31.5+10100.00%0.98%14
361 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:33.1 +2:31.6+10106.67%0.98%46
362 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:33.2 +2:31.7+10113.33%0.98%20
363 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:33.2 +2:31.7+10113.33%0.98%4
364 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:33.2 +2:31.7+10113.33%0.98%36
365 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:33.3 +2:31.8+10120.00%0.98%39
366 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:33.4 +2:31.9+10126.67%0.98%13
367 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:33.4 +2:31.9+10126.67%0.98%34
368 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:33.4 +2:31.9+10126.67%0.98%20
369 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:33.4 +2:31.9+10126.67%0.98%6
370 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:33.4 +2:31.9+10126.67%0.98%22
371 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:33.6 +2:32.1+10140.00%0.98%33
372 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:33.7 +2:32.2+10146.67%0.98%15
373 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:33.8 +2:32.3+10153.33%0.98%14
374 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:33.9 +2:32.4+10160.00%0.97%31
375 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:33.9 +2:32.4+10160.00%0.97%20
376 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:33.9 +2:32.4+10160.00%0.97%10
377 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:34.0 +2:32.5+10166.67%0.97%12
378 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:34.0 +2:32.5+10166.67%0.97%5
379 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:34.2 +2:32.7+10180.00%0.97%7
380 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:34.2 +2:32.7+10180.00%0.97%16
381 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:34.3 +2:32.8+10186.67%0.97%28
382 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:34.3 +2:32.8+10186.67%0.97%20
383 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:34.4 +2:32.9+10193.33%0.97%14
384 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:34.5 +2:33.0+10200.00%0.97%20
385 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:34.7 +2:33.2+10213.33%0.97%49
386 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:34.7 +2:33.2+10213.33%0.97%11
387 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:34.7 +2:33.2+10213.33%0.97%30
388 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:34.8 +2:33.3+10220.00%0.97%41
389 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:34.8 +2:33.3+10220.00%0.97%2
390 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:34.9 +2:33.4+10226.67%0.97%40
391 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:35.1 +2:33.6+10240.00%0.97%15
392 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:35.2 +2:33.7+10246.67%0.97%17
393 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:35.2 +2:33.7+10246.67%0.97%13
394 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:35.4 +2:33.9+10260.00%0.97%8
395 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:35.4 +2:33.9+10260.00%0.97%35
396 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:35.4 +2:33.9+10260.00%0.97%21
397 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:35.5 +2:34.0+10266.67%0.96%37
398 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:35.5 +2:34.0+10266.67%0.96%8
399 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:35.7 +2:34.2+10280.00%0.96%34
400 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:35.8 +2:34.3+10286.67%0.96%24
401 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:35.9 +2:34.4+10293.33%0.96%27
402 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:35.9 +2:34.4+10293.33%0.96%33
403 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:36.0 +2:34.5+10300.00%0.96%47
404 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:36.0 +2:34.5+10300.00%0.96%19
405 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:36.0 +2:34.5+10300.00%0.96%6
406 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:36.0 +2:34.5+10300.00%0.96%38
407 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:36.0 +2:34.5+10300.00%0.96%25
408 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:36.1 +2:34.6+10306.67%0.96%16
409 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:36.1 +2:34.6+10306.67%0.96%45
410 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:36.2 +2:34.7+10313.33%0.96%18
411 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:36.3 +2:34.8+10320.00%0.96%15
412 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:36.3 +2:34.8+10320.00%0.96%31
413 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:36.4 +2:34.9+10326.67%0.96%48
414 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:36.4 +2:34.9+10326.67%0.96%18
415 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:36.5 +2:35.0+10333.33%0.96%9
416 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:36.7 +2:35.2+10346.67%0.96%10
417 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:36.7 +2:35.2+10346.67%0.96%44
418 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:36.8 +2:35.3+10353.33%0.96%2
419 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:36.8 +2:35.3+10353.33%0.96%14
420 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:36.8 +2:35.3+10353.33%0.96%3
421 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:36.8 +2:35.3+10353.33%0.96%16
422 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:36.9 +2:35.4+10360.00%0.96%26
423 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:37.1 +2:35.6+10373.33%0.95%19
424 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:37.2 +2:35.7+10380.00%0.95%23
425 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:37.3 +2:35.8+10386.67%0.95%32
426 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:37.3 +2:35.8+10386.67%0.95%23
427 168 Cevan Skinner Orem, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:37.4 +2:35.9+10393.33%0.95%49
428 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:37.5 +2:36.0+10400.00%0.95%5
429 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:37.6 +2:36.1+10406.67%0.95%4
430 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:37.6 +2:36.1+10406.67%0.95%4
431 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:37.9 +2:36.4+10426.67%0.95%43
432 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:37.9 +2:36.4+10426.67%0.95%3
433 21 Jacob Breeding Manhattan, KS  25 to 29 29 M 2:38.0 +2:36.5+10433.33%0.95%19
434 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:38.2 +2:36.7+10446.67%0.95%4
435 24 Lane Brooks Highland, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:38.2 +2:36.7+10446.67%0.95%36
436 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:38.3 +2:36.8+10453.33%0.95%2
437 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:38.9 +2:37.4+10493.33%0.94%35
438 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:39.0 +2:37.5+10500.00%0.94%2
439 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:39.0 +2:37.5+10500.00%0.94%10
440 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:39.0 +2:37.5+10500.00%0.94%21
441 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:39.1 +2:37.6+10506.67%0.94%12
442 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:39.2 +2:37.7+10513.33%0.94%33
443 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:39.2 +2:37.7+10513.33%0.94%19
444 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:39.2 +2:37.7+10513.33%0.94%20
445 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:39.4 +2:37.9+10526.67%0.94%11
446 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:39.4 +2:37.9+10526.67%0.94%14
447 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:39.5 +2:38.0+10533.33%0.94%5
447 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:39.5 +2:38.0+10533.33%0.94%6
449 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:39.6 +2:38.1+10540.00%0.94%15
450 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:39.6 +2:38.1+10540.00%0.94%9
451 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:39.6 +2:38.1+10540.00%0.94%12
452 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:39.8 +2:38.3+10553.33%0.94%17
453 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:39.8 +2:38.3+10553.33%0.94%7
454 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:39.9 +2:38.4+10560.00%0.94%17
455 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:40.0 +2:38.5+10566.67%0.94%8
456 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:40.1 +2:38.6+10573.33%0.94%3
457 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:40.3 +2:38.8+10586.67%0.94%32
458 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:40.6 +2:39.1+10606.67%0.93%10
459 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:40.7 +2:39.2+10613.33%0.93%28
460 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:40.7 +2:39.2+10613.33%0.93%13
461 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:40.8 +2:39.3+10620.00%0.93%36
462 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:40.9 +2:39.4+10626.67%0.93%35
463 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:41.3 +2:39.8+10653.33%0.93%18
464 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:41.5 +2:40.0+10666.67%0.93%21
465 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:41.7 +2:40.2+10680.00%0.93%14
466 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:42.0 +2:40.5+10700.00%0.93%12
467 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:42.4 +2:40.9+10726.67%0.92%11
468 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:42.4 +2:40.9+10726.67%0.92%25
469 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:42.5 +2:41.0+10733.33%0.92%37
470 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:42.8 +2:41.3+10753.33%0.92%16
471 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:42.9 +2:41.4+10760.00%0.92%43
472 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:42.9 +2:41.4+10760.00%0.92%19
473 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:43.0 +2:41.5+10766.67%0.92%45
474 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:43.1 +2:41.6+10773.33%0.92%41
475 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:43.2 +2:41.7+10780.00%0.92%36
476 59 Cody Garrett Layton, UT  35 to 39 39 M 2:43.5 +2:42.0+10800.00%0.92%26
477 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:43.8 +2:42.3+10820.00%0.92%1
478 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:44.0 +2:42.5+10833.33%0.91%38
479 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:44.3 +2:42.8+10853.33%0.91%17
479 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:44.3 +2:42.8+10853.33%0.91%38
479 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:44.3 +2:42.8+10853.33%0.91%42
482 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:44.3 +2:42.8+10853.33%0.91%23
483 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:44.6 +2:43.1+10873.33%0.91%20
484 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:45.0 +2:43.5+10900.00%0.91%22
485 37 Ron Cragun Tooele, UT  55 to 59 56 M 2:45.3 +2:43.8+10920.00%0.91%21
486 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:45.3 +2:43.8+10920.00%0.91%39
487 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:45.6 +2:44.1+10940.00%0.91%29
488 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:45.8 +2:44.3+10953.33%0.90%24
489 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:45.9 +2:44.4+10960.00%0.90%23
490 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:46.0 +2:44.5+10966.67%0.90%40
491 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:46.1 +2:44.6+10973.33%0.90%26
492 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:46.7 +2:45.2+11013.33%0.90%33
493 130 Lucas Miller Orem, UT  30 to 34 34 M 2:46.8 +2:45.3+11020.00%0.90%1
494 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:47.2 +2:45.7+11046.67%0.90%45
495 198 Adam Gray Draper, UT  10 to 14 13 M 2:48.1 +2:46.6+11106.67%0.89%46
496 43 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  40 to 44 40 M 2:48.5 +2:47.0+11133.33%0.89%40
497 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:48.8 +2:47.3+11153.33%0.89%40
498 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:49.0 +2:47.5+11166.67%0.89%27
498 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:49.0 +2:47.5+11166.67%0.89%29
500 218 Dan Jolley West Jordan, UT  65 to 69 66 M 2:49.1 +2:47.6+11173.33%0.89%39
Page / 2
Racers per page: