2023 Revolution Run

Saturday, December 31, 2022 7:59 AM (GMT-7) - Final results

Race info
Sport: Running
Location: Kearns, UT, United States
View on map
Start type: Manual wave start
Wave grouping: By distance
Racers: 36
Laps: Time-limited
Timed on: LENOVO 82BH
Timed with: Webscorer PRO 6.0
Chip timing: RFID - LLRP
Updated: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 12:56 PM (GMT-7)
Organized by: On Hill Events
Race website: http://www.onhillevents.com

Contact organizer

Use this form to send an email to the organizer.

Your name
Your email address
Confirm email address
Message to organizer
Send

  • Race winners »
  • Most Laps in 5 Hours
  • Lap times
Page / 5
Racers per page:
Place Bib Name Affiliation Category Age Gender Lap time
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%32
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%36
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%37
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%46
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%47
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1.82%98.21%28
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1.82%98.21%34
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1.82%98.21%41
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%26
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%31
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%42
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%43
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%48
14 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.8 +0:00.3+5.45%94.83%38
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9.09%91.67%27
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9.09%91.67%35
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9.09%91.67%39
18 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.2 +0:00.7+12.73%88.71%30
19 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.3 +0:00.8+14.55%87.30%49
20 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.7 +0:01.2+21.82%82.09%25
21 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:07.0 +0:01.5+27.27%78.57%44
22 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:08.0 +0:02.5+45.45%68.75%45
23 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:08.3 +0:02.8+50.91%66.27%40
24 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:09.0 +0:03.5+63.64%61.11%29
25 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:45.0 +0:39.5+718.18%12.22%33
26 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.2 +0:54.7+994.55%9.14%49
27 42 Christy Rand West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 47 F 1:00.5 +0:55.0+1000.00%9.09%18
28 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.6 +0:55.1+1001.82%9.08%45
29 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.7 +0:55.2+1003.64%9.06%42
30 42 Christy Rand West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 47 F 1:00.8 +0:55.3+1005.45%9.05%25
31 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.8 +0:55.3+1005.45%9.05%19
32 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.0 +0:55.5+1009.09%9.02%48
33 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.3 +0:55.8+1014.55%8.97%43
34 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.5 +0:56.0+1018.18%8.94%44
34 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.5 +0:56.0+1018.18%8.94%46
36 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.6 +0:56.1+1020.00%8.93%51
37 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.7 +0:56.2+1021.82%8.91%58
37 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 1:01.7 +0:56.2+1021.82%8.91%66
39 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.8 +0:56.3+1023.64%8.90%50
40 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:02.6 +0:57.1+1038.18%8.79%61
41 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 1:03.7 +0:58.2+1058.18%8.63%50
42 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:04.1 +0:58.6+1065.45%8.58%47
43 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 1:04.2 +0:58.7+1067.27%8.57%95
44 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:06.4 +1:00.9+1107.27%8.28%6
45 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:08.2 +1:02.7+1140.00%8.06%64
46 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 1:08.3 +1:02.8+1141.82%8.05%45
47 42 Christy Rand West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 47 F 1:13.4 +1:07.9+1234.55%7.49%24
48 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 1:15.7 +1:10.2+1276.36%7.27%61
49 81 Joshua Hansen   40 to 44 41 M 1:18.8 +1:13.3+1332.73%6.98%10
50 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 1:29.9 +1:24.4+1534.55%6.12%52
51 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:48.8 +1:43.3+1878.18%5.06%28
52 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 1:49.9 +1:44.4+1898.18%5.00%62
53 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:51.2 +1:45.7+1921.82%4.95%1
54 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:51.8 +1:46.3+1932.73%4.92%2
55 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:55.1 +1:49.6+1992.73%4.78%13
56 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:57.5 +1:52.0+2036.36%4.68%3
57 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:58.9 +1:53.4+2061.82%4.63%4
58 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 1:59.2 +1:53.7+2067.27%4.61%1
59 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:01.5 +1:56.0+2109.09%4.53%7
60 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.2 +1:56.7+2121.82%4.50%11
61 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.3 +1:56.8+2123.64%4.50%6
62 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.6 +1:57.1+2129.09%4.49%5
63 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 F 2:02.6 +1:57.1+2129.09%4.49%58
64 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:03.0 +1:57.5+2136.36%4.47%12
65 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 2:03.2 +1:57.7+2140.00%4.46%60
66 17 Cathi Gridley Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:03.2 +1:57.7+2140.00%4.46%80
67 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:03.5 +1:58.0+2145.45%4.45%1
68 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:05.3 +1:59.8+2178.18%4.39%14
69 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:05.4 +1:59.9+2180.00%4.39%3
70 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:05.9 +2:00.4+2189.09%4.37%13
71 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:06.0 +2:00.5+2190.91%4.37%2
72 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:06.7 +2:01.2+2203.64%4.34%4
73 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:06.8 +2:01.3+2205.45%4.34%5
74 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:07.0 +2:01.5+2209.09%4.33%7
75 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.0 +2:01.5+2209.09%4.33%8
76 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.1 +2:01.6+2210.91%4.33%10
77 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.1 +2:01.6+2210.91%4.33%9
78 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:07.3 +2:01.8+2214.55%4.32%6
79 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:07.6 +2:02.1+2220.00%4.31%4
80 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:07.8 +2:02.3+2223.64%4.30%18
81 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:08.2 +2:02.7+2230.91%4.29%15
82 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.3 +2:02.8+2232.73%4.29%19
83 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.5 +2:03.0+2236.36%4.28%3
84 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:08.7 +2:03.2+2240.00%4.27%56
85 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.8 +2:03.3+2241.82%4.27%6
86 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:08.9 +2:03.4+2243.64%4.27%53
87 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.0 +2:03.5+2245.45%4.26%11
88 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:09.1 +2:03.6+2247.27%4.26%17
89 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:09.3 +2:03.8+2250.91%4.25%2
90 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:09.4 +2:03.9+2252.73%4.25%3
91 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.4 +2:03.9+2252.73%4.25%8
92 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:09.6 +2:04.1+2256.36%4.24%43
93 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.6 +2:04.1+2256.36%4.24%6
94 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:09.8 +2:04.3+2260.00%4.24%5
95 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.0 +2:04.5+2263.64%4.23%8
96 46 Monte Riding West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:10.1 +2:04.6+2265.45%4.23%31
97 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.3 +2:04.8+2269.09%4.22%24
98 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270.91%4.22%7
99 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270.91%4.22%4
100 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270.91%4.22%14
101 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.7 +2:05.2+2276.36%4.21%22
102 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.7 +2:05.2+2276.36%4.21%40
103 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.1 +2:05.6+2283.64%4.20%5
104 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285.45%4.19%46
105 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285.45%4.19%16
105 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285.45%4.19%20
107 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.4 +2:05.9+2289.09%4.19%17
108 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.5 +2:06.0+2290.91%4.18%47
109 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.5 +2:06.0+2290.91%4.18%19
110 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292.73%4.18%13
110 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292.73%4.18%18
110 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292.73%4.18%23
113 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292.73%4.18%21
114 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.7 +2:06.2+2294.55%4.18%20
115 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.7 +2:06.2+2294.55%4.18%23
116 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296.36%4.17%17
116 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296.36%4.17%22
118 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296.36%4.17%14
119 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:11.9 +2:06.4+2298.18%4.17%23
120 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:12.0 +2:06.5+2300.00%4.17%15
121 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:12.1 +2:06.6+2301.82%4.16%21
122 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.2 +2:06.7+2303.64%4.16%11
123 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.3 +2:06.8+2305.45%4.16%32
124 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:12.4 +2:06.9+2307.27%4.15%23
125 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.4 +2:06.9+2307.27%4.15%48
126 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.5 +2:07.0+2309.09%4.15%28
127 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.6 +2:07.1+2310.91%4.15%21
128 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.7 +2:07.2+2312.73%4.14%15
129 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:12.8 +2:07.3+2314.55%4.14%8
130 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.9 +2:07.4+2316.36%4.14%41
131 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.9 +2:07.4+2316.36%4.14%29
132 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:13.1 +2:07.6+2320.00%4.13%9
133 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.2 +2:07.6+2320.00%4.13%19
134 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%33
135 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%24
136 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%22
137 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%9
138 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%18
139 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:13.4 +2:07.9+2325.45%4.12%23
140 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:13.7 +2:08.2+2330.91%4.11%7
141 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:13.9 +2:08.4+2334.55%4.11%9
142 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.0 +2:08.5+2336.36%4.10%12
143 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.0 +2:08.5+2336.36%4.10%36
144 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.1 +2:08.6+2338.18%4.10%17
145 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.2 +2:08.6+2338.18%4.10%10
146 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.2 +2:08.7+2340.00%4.10%25
147 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.2 +2:08.7+2340.00%4.10%14
148 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:14.3 +2:08.8+2341.82%4.10%12
149 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:14.4 +2:08.9+2343.64%4.09%12
150 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.5 +2:09.0+2345.45%4.09%13
151 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:14.5 +2:09.0+2345.45%4.09%10
152 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:14.6 +2:09.1+2347.27%4.09%16
153 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.6 +2:09.1+2347.27%4.09%10
154 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.7 +2:09.2+2349.09%4.08%2
155 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:15.0 +2:09.5+2354.55%4.07%25
156 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:15.0 +2:09.5+2354.55%4.07%24
157 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358.18%4.07%12
158 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358.18%4.07%42
159 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358.18%4.07%1
160 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.3 +2:09.8+2360.00%4.07%38
161 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:15.3 +2:09.8+2360.00%4.07%120
162 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:15.7 +2:10.2+2367.27%4.05%9
163 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:15.7 +2:10.2+2367.27%4.05%13
164 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.9 +2:10.4+2370.91%4.05%34
165 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.0 +2:10.5+2372.73%4.04%20
166 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:16.0 +2:10.5+2372.73%4.04%6
167 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:16.1 +2:10.6+2374.55%4.04%26
168 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.1 +2:10.6+2374.55%4.04%6
169 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:16.3 +2:10.8+2378.18%4.04%102
170 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.4 +2:10.9+2380.00%4.03%8
171 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:16.5 +2:11.0+2381.82%4.03%37
172 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:17.1 +2:11.6+2392.73%4.01%13
173 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:17.2 +2:11.7+2394.55%4.01%12
174 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:17.5 +2:12.0+2400.00%4.00%10
175 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:17.5 +2:12.0+2400.00%4.00%121
176 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401.82%4.00%44
177 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401.82%4.00%11
178 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401.82%4.00%16
179 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:17.7 +2:12.2+2403.64%3.99%4
180 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.8 +2:12.3+2405.45%3.99%30
181 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.8 +2:12.3+2405.45%3.99%31
182 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:17.9 +2:12.4+2407.27%3.99%7
183 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:17.9 +2:12.4+2407.27%3.99%7
184 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:18.1 +2:12.6+2410.91%3.98%24
185 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:18.2 +2:12.7+2412.73%3.98%22
186 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:18.5 +2:13.0+2418.18%3.97%21
187 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:18.6 +2:13.1+2420.00%3.97%27
188 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:18.9 +2:13.4+2425.45%3.96%9
189 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.1 +2:13.6+2429.09%3.95%4
190 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.3 +2:13.8+2432.73%3.95%5
191 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.3 +2:13.8+2432.73%3.95%23
192 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434.55%3.95%5
193 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434.55%3.95%10
194 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434.55%3.95%4
194 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434.55%3.95%19
196 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.5 +2:14.0+2436.36%3.94%8
197 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:19.6 +2:14.1+2438.18%3.94%28
197 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:19.6 +2:14.1+2438.18%3.94%29
199 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:19.9 +2:14.4+2443.64%3.93%11
200 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:20.2 +2:14.7+2449.09%3.92%14
201 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:20.2 +2:14.7+2449.09%3.92%32
202 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:20.3 +2:14.8+2450.91%3.92%16
203 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:20.3 +2:14.8+2450.91%3.92%17
204 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:20.7 +2:15.2+2458.18%3.91%27
205 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:20.8 +2:15.3+2460.00%3.91%15
206 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:20.9 +2:15.4+2461.82%3.90%21
207 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:21.3 +2:15.8+2469.09%3.89%20
208 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:21.5 +2:16.0+2472.73%3.89%34
209 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:21.5 +2:16.0+2472.73%3.89%38
210 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:21.6 +2:16.1+2474.55%3.88%18
211 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:21.7 +2:16.2+2476.36%3.88%31
212 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:21.7 +2:16.2+2476.36%3.88%18
213 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:21.8 +2:16.3+2478.18%3.88%1
214 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:21.8 +2:16.3+2478.18%3.88%14
215 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:21.9 +2:16.4+2480.00%3.88%42
216 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:22.1 +2:16.6+2483.64%3.87%30
217 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:22.1 +2:16.6+2483.64%3.87%16
218 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:22.3 +2:16.8+2487.27%3.87%63
219 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:22.4 +2:16.9+2489.09%3.86%19
220 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:22.4 +2:16.9+2489.09%3.86%3
221 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:22.5 +2:17.0+2490.91%3.86%27
222 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:22.6 +2:17.1+2492.73%3.86%3
223 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:22.6 +2:17.1+2492.73%3.86%44
224 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:22.8 +2:17.3+2496.36%3.85%26
224 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:22.8 +2:17.3+2496.36%3.85%26
226 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:22.8 +2:17.4+2498.18%3.85%25
227 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501.82%3.84%33
228 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501.82%3.84%20
229 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501.82%3.84%41
230 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:23.4 +2:17.9+2507.27%3.84%36
231 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:23.6 +2:18.1+2510.91%3.83%28
232 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:23.6 +2:18.1+2510.91%3.83%38
233 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.6 +2:18.1+2510.91%3.83%26
234 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.7 +2:18.2+2512.73%3.83%37
234 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.7 +2:18.2+2512.73%3.83%50
236 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.8 +2:18.3+2514.55%3.82%29
237 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:23.8 +2:18.3+2514.55%3.82%26
238 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516.36%3.82%17
238 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516.36%3.82%35
240 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516.36%3.82%40
241 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.1 +2:18.6+2520.00%3.82%47
242 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.1 +2:18.6+2520.00%3.82%35
243 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.2 +2:18.7+2521.82%3.81%18
244 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.3 +2:18.8+2523.64%3.81%19
245 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:24.3 +2:18.8+2523.64%3.81%37
246 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.4 +2:18.9+2525.45%3.81%48
247 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.5 +2:19.0+2527.27%3.81%52
248 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.5 +2:19.0+2527.27%3.81%2
249 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.7 +2:19.2+2530.91%3.80%43
250 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.7 +2:19.2+2530.91%3.80%17
251 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:24.8 +2:19.3+2532.73%3.80%45
252 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.9 +2:19.4+2534.55%3.80%15
253 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:25.1 +2:19.6+2538.18%3.79%28
254 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:25.1 +2:19.6+2538.18%3.79%13
255 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:25.1 +2:19.6+2538.18%3.79%36
256 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:25.1 +2:19.6+2538.18%3.79%25
257 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540.00%3.79%19
257 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540.00%3.79%33
257 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540.00%3.79%39
257 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540.00%3.79%42
261 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540.00%3.79%30
262 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:25.3 +2:19.8+2541.82%3.79%40
263 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:25.3 +2:19.8+2541.82%3.79%31
264 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:25.5 +2:20.0+2545.45%3.78%34
265 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:25.6 +2:20.1+2547.27%3.78%29
266 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:25.6 +2:20.1+2547.27%3.78%60
267 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:25.7 +2:20.2+2549.09%3.77%5
268 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:25.8 +2:20.3+2550.91%3.77%39
269 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:25.8 +2:20.3+2550.91%3.77%1
270 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:25.8 +2:20.3+2550.91%3.77%18
271 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:25.8 +2:20.3+2550.91%3.77%59
272 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:26.0 +2:20.5+2554.55%3.77%41
273 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:26.1 +2:20.6+2556.36%3.76%96
274 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:26.1 +2:20.6+2556.36%3.76%27
275 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:26.2 +2:20.7+2558.18%3.76%90
276 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:26.3 +2:20.8+2560.00%3.76%16
277 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:26.4 +2:20.9+2561.82%3.76%20
278 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:26.4 +2:20.9+2561.82%3.76%5
279 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:26.5 +2:21.0+2563.64%3.75%46
280 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:26.5 +2:21.0+2563.64%3.75%55
281 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:26.6 +2:21.1+2565.45%3.75%65
282 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:26.6 +2:21.1+2565.45%3.75%72
283 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:26.7 +2:21.2+2567.27%3.75%18
284 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:26.7 +2:21.2+2567.27%3.75%69
285 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:26.8 +2:21.3+2569.09%3.75%44
286 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:26.8 +2:21.3+2569.09%3.75%6
287 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:26.9 +2:21.4+2570.91%3.74%53
288 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:26.9 +2:21.4+2570.91%3.74%24
289 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:27.0 +2:21.5+2572.73%3.74%56
290 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:27.0 +2:21.5+2572.73%3.74%68
291 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:27.1 +2:21.6+2574.55%3.74%54
292 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:27.2 +2:21.7+2576.36%3.74%2
293 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:27.2 +2:21.7+2576.36%3.74%66
294 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:27.2 +2:21.7+2576.36%3.74%51
295 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:27.3 +2:21.8+2578.18%3.73%49
296 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:27.4 +2:21.9+2580.00%3.73%28
297 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:27.5 +2:22.0+2581.82%3.73%70
298 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:27.5 +2:22.0+2581.82%3.73%61
299 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:27.6 +2:22.1+2583.64%3.73%64
300 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:27.7 +2:22.2+2585.45%3.72%2
301 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:27.7 +2:22.2+2585.45%3.72%22
302 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:27.8 +2:22.3+2587.27%3.72%71
303 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:27.9 +2:22.4+2589.09%3.72%20
304 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:27.9 +2:22.4+2589.09%3.72%73
305 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:28.0 +2:22.5+2590.91%3.72%22
306 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:28.0 +2:22.5+2590.91%3.72%117
307 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:28.1 +2:22.6+2592.73%3.71%21
308 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:28.2 +2:22.7+2594.55%3.71%32
309 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:28.2 +2:22.7+2594.55%3.71%92
310 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:28.3 +2:22.8+2596.36%3.71%46
311 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:28.4 +2:22.9+2598.18%3.71%9
312 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:28.4 +2:22.9+2598.18%3.71%77
313 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:28.4 +2:22.9+2598.18%3.71%49
314 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:28.4 +2:22.9+2598.18%3.71%19
315 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:28.5 +2:23.0+2600.00%3.70%33
316 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:28.5 +2:23.0+2600.00%3.70%4
317 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:28.5 +2:23.0+2600.00%3.70%63
318 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601.82%3.70%29
319 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601.82%3.70%4
319 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601.82%3.70%6
321 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601.82%3.70%80
322 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:28.7 +2:23.2+2603.64%3.70%81
323 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:28.8 +2:23.3+2605.45%3.70%89
324 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:28.9 +2:23.4+2607.27%3.69%30
325 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:28.9 +2:23.4+2607.27%3.69%3
326 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:29.1 +2:23.6+2610.91%3.69%43
327 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:29.2 +2:23.7+2612.73%3.69%47
328 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:29.2 +2:23.7+2612.73%3.69%119
329 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:29.2 +2:23.7+2612.73%3.69%82
330 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:29.2 +2:23.7+2612.73%3.69%36
331 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:29.3 +2:23.8+2614.55%3.68%16
332 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:29.4 +2:23.9+2616.36%3.68%116
333 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:29.5 +2:24.0+2618.18%3.68%10
333 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:29.5 +2:24.0+2618.18%3.68%45
335 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:29.5 +2:24.0+2618.18%3.68%31
336 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:29.6 +2:24.1+2620.00%3.68%88
337 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 F 2:29.6 +2:24.1+2620.00%3.68%57
338 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:29.6 +2:24.1+2620.00%3.68%23
339 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:29.7 +2:24.2+2621.82%3.67%76
340 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:29.7 +2:24.2+2621.82%3.67%17
341 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:29.7 +2:24.2+2621.82%3.67%87
342 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:29.9 +2:24.4+2625.45%3.67%18
343 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:30.0 +2:24.5+2627.27%3.67%58
344 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:30.0 +2:24.5+2627.27%3.67%8
345 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:30.0 +2:24.5+2627.27%3.67%62
346 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:30.1 +2:24.6+2629.09%3.66%23
347 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:30.2 +2:24.7+2630.91%3.66%35
348 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:30.2 +2:24.7+2630.91%3.66%3
349 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:30.3 +2:24.8+2632.73%3.66%53
350 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:30.3 +2:24.8+2632.73%3.66%1
351 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:30.5 +2:25.0+2636.36%3.65%78
352 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:30.6 +2:25.1+2638.18%3.65%94
353 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:30.7 +2:25.2+2640.00%3.65%93
354 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:30.8 +2:25.3+2641.82%3.65%21
355 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 2:30.8 +2:25.3+2641.82%3.65%59
356 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:30.8 +2:25.3+2641.82%3.65%118
357 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:30.9 +2:25.4+2643.64%3.64%7
358 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:31.0 +2:25.5+2645.45%3.64%48
359 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:31.0 +2:25.5+2645.45%3.64%30
360 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:31.1 +2:25.6+2647.27%3.64%5
361 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:31.2 +2:25.7+2649.09%3.64%31
362 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:31.2 +2:25.7+2649.09%3.64%34
363 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:31.3 +2:25.8+2650.91%3.64%45
364 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:31.5 +2:26.0+2654.55%3.63%98
365 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:31.5 +2:26.0+2654.55%3.63%16
366 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:31.6 +2:26.1+2656.36%3.63%16
367 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:31.6 +2:26.1+2656.36%3.63%50
368 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:31.7 +2:26.2+2658.18%3.63%20
369 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:31.7 +2:26.2+2658.18%3.63%7
370 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:31.7 +2:26.2+2658.18%3.63%75
371 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:31.8 +2:26.3+2660.00%3.62%4
372 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:31.9 +2:26.4+2661.82%3.62%49
373 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:32.0 +2:26.5+2663.64%3.62%14
374 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:32.0 +2:26.5+2663.64%3.62%96
375 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:32.0 +2:26.5+2663.64%3.62%6
376 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:32.1 +2:26.6+2665.45%3.62%91
377 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:32.2 +2:26.7+2667.27%3.61%11
378 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:32.2 +2:26.7+2667.27%3.61%103
379 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:32.3 +2:26.8+2669.09%3.61%6
380 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:32.4 +2:26.9+2670.91%3.61%11
381 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:32.5 +2:27.0+2672.73%3.61%19
382 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:32.5 +2:27.0+2672.73%3.61%2
383 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:32.6 +2:27.1+2674.55%3.60%7
384 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:32.6 +2:27.1+2674.55%3.60%102
385 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:32.6 +2:27.1+2674.55%3.60%115
386 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:32.6 +2:27.1+2674.55%3.60%96
387 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:32.7 +2:27.2+2676.36%3.60%3
388 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:32.7 +2:27.2+2676.36%3.60%17
389 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:32.8 +2:27.3+2678.18%3.60%9
390 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:32.8 +2:27.3+2678.18%3.60%85
391 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:33.1 +2:27.6+2683.64%3.59%51
392 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:33.2 +2:27.7+2685.45%3.59%54
393 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:33.3 +2:27.8+2687.27%3.59%83
394 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:33.3 +2:27.8+2687.27%3.59%12
395 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:33.3 +2:27.8+2687.27%3.59%40
396 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:33.3 +2:27.8+2687.27%3.59%95
397 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:33.4 +2:27.9+2689.09%3.59%67
398 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:33.6 +2:28.1+2692.73%3.58%108
399 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:33.6 +2:28.1+2692.73%3.58%105
400 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:33.7 +2:28.2+2694.55%3.58%104
401 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:33.9 +2:28.4+2698.18%3.57%15
402 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:34.0 +2:28.5+2700.00%3.57%11
403 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:34.0 +2:28.5+2700.00%3.57%7
404 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:34.0 +2:28.5+2700.00%3.57%99
405 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:34.1 +2:28.6+2701.82%3.57%5
406 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:34.2 +2:28.7+2703.64%3.57%114
407 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:34.2 +2:28.7+2703.64%3.57%39
408 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:34.3 +2:28.8+2705.45%3.56%42
409 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:34.4 +2:28.9+2707.27%3.56%26
410 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:34.5 +2:29.0+2709.09%3.56%10
411 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.5 +2:29.0+2709.09%3.56%12
412 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.6 +2:29.1+2710.91%3.56%2
413 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712.73%3.56%59
414 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712.73%3.56%96
415 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712.73%3.56%113
416 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712.73%3.56%48
417 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:34.8 +2:29.3+2714.55%3.55%14
418 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.8 +2:29.3+2714.55%3.55%13
419 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:34.8 +2:29.3+2714.55%3.55%17
420 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:34.8 +2:29.3+2714.55%3.55%41
421 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:34.9 +2:29.4+2716.36%3.55%12
422 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:35.0 +2:29.5+2718.18%3.55%101
423 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:35.2 +2:29.6+2720.00%3.54%15
424 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:35.2 +2:29.7+2721.82%3.54%8
425 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:35.3 +2:29.8+2723.64%3.54%4
426 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:35.3 +2:29.8+2723.64%3.54%25
427 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:35.4 +2:29.9+2725.45%3.54%25
428 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 2:35.4 +2:29.9+2725.45%3.54%58
429 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:35.4 +2:29.9+2725.45%3.54%84
430 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:35.4 +2:29.9+2725.45%3.54%110
431 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:35.5 +2:30.0+2727.27%3.54%18
432 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:35.6 +2:30.1+2729.09%3.53%35
433 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:35.6 +2:30.1+2729.09%3.53%37
434 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:35.6 +2:30.1+2729.09%3.53%3
435 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:35.6 +2:30.1+2729.09%3.53%9
436 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:35.7 +2:30.2+2730.91%3.53%21
437 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 F 2:35.7 +2:30.2+2730.91%3.53%53
438 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:35.7 +2:30.2+2730.91%3.53%43
439 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:35.8 +2:30.3+2732.73%3.53%10
440 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 2:35.8 +2:30.3+2732.73%3.53%55
441 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:35.9 +2:30.4+2734.55%3.53%12
442 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736.36%3.53%24
443 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736.36%3.53%50
443 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 F 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736.36%3.53%56
443 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736.36%3.53%59
446 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:36.2 +2:30.7+2740.00%3.52%27
447 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:36.2 +2:30.7+2740.00%3.52%112
448 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:36.3 +2:30.8+2741.82%3.52%26
449 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:36.3 +2:30.8+2741.82%3.52%6
450 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:36.4 +2:30.8+2741.82%3.52%11
451 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:36.4 +2:30.9+2743.64%3.52%3
451 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:36.4 +2:30.9+2743.64%3.52%14
453 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:36.4 +2:30.9+2743.64%3.52%109
454 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:36.5 +2:31.0+2745.45%3.51%8
455 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:36.6 +2:31.1+2747.27%3.51%15
456 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:36.6 +2:31.1+2747.27%3.51%23
457 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:36.6 +2:31.1+2747.27%3.51%43
458 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:36.7 +2:31.2+2749.09%3.51%21
459 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:36.8 +2:31.3+2750.91%3.51%20
460 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:36.9 +2:31.4+2752.73%3.51%22
461 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:36.9 +2:31.4+2752.73%3.51%22
462 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:37.1 +2:31.6+2756.36%3.50%16
463 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:37.1 +2:31.6+2756.36%3.50%19
464 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 F 2:37.2 +2:31.7+2758.18%3.50%57
465 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:37.2 +2:31.7+2758.18%3.50%16
466 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:37.2 +2:31.7+2758.18%3.50%23
467 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:37.2 +2:31.7+2758.18%3.50%59
468 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760.00%3.50%13
469 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760.00%3.50%58
470 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760.00%3.50%1
470 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760.00%3.50%15
472 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:37.5 +2:32.0+2763.64%3.49%2
473 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:37.7 +2:32.2+2767.27%3.49%71
474 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 F 2:37.7 +2:32.2+2767.27%3.49%38
475 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:37.8 +2:32.3+2769.09%3.49%8
476 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 F 2:37.8 +2:32.3+2769.09%3.49%55
477 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 F 2:37.9 +2:32.4+2770.91%3.48%13
478 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:38.0 +2:32.5+2772.73%3.48%22
479 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 F 2:38.1 +2:32.6+2774.55%3.48%28
480 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:38.1 +2:32.6+2774.55%3.48%31
481 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:38.1 +2:32.6+2774.55%3.48%25
482 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:38.2 +2:32.7+2776.36%3.48%47
483 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:38.3 +2:32.8+2778.18%3.47%37
484 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:38.3 +2:32.8+2778.18%3.47%3
484 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:38.3 +2:32.8+2778.18%3.47%16
486 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:38.4 +2:32.9+2780.00%3.47%6
487 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 F 2:38.7 +2:33.2+2785.45%3.47%57
488 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:38.7 +2:33.2+2785.45%3.47%60
489 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:38.7 +2:33.2+2785.45%3.47%31
490 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:38.8 +2:33.3+2787.27%3.46%30
491 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:38.8 +2:33.3+2787.27%3.46%55
492 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:38.8 +2:33.3+2787.27%3.46%5
493 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:39.0 +2:33.5+2790.91%3.46%76
494 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:39.0 +2:33.5+2790.91%3.46%57
495 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:39.1 +2:33.6+2792.73%3.46%36
496 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:39.1 +2:33.6+2792.73%3.46%22
497 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 F 2:39.1 +2:33.6+2792.73%3.46%45
498 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:39.3 +2:33.8+2796.36%3.45%18
499 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:39.4 +2:33.9+2798.18%3.45%26
500 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 F 2:39.4 +2:33.9+2798.18%3.45%21
Page / 5
Racers per page: