2023 Revolution Run

Saturday, December 31, 2022 7:59 AM (GMT-7) - Final results

Race info
Sport: Running
Location: Kearns, UT, United States
View on map
Start type: Manual wave start
Wave grouping: By distance
Racers: 20
Laps: Time-limited
Timed on: LENOVO 82BH
Timed with: Webscorer PRO 6.0
Chip timing: RFID - LLRP
Updated: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 12:56 PM (GMT-7)
Organized by: On Hill Events
Race website: http://www.onhillevents.com

Contact organizer

Use this form to send an email to the organizer.

Your name
Your email address
Confirm email address
Message to organizer
Send

  • Race winners »
  • Most Laps in 5 Hours Male
  • Lap times
Page / 3
Racers per page:
Place Bib Name Affiliation Category Age Gender Lap time
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%32
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%36
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%37
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%46
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%47
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1.82%98.21%28
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1.82%98.21%34
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1.82%98.21%41
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%26
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%31
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%42
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%43
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%48
14 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.8 +0:00.3+5.45%94.83%38
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9.09%91.67%27
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9.09%91.67%35
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9.09%91.67%39
18 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.2 +0:00.7+12.73%88.71%30
19 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.3 +0:00.8+14.55%87.30%49
20 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.7 +0:01.2+21.82%82.09%25
21 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:07.0 +0:01.5+27.27%78.57%44
22 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:08.0 +0:02.5+45.45%68.75%45
23 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:08.3 +0:02.8+50.91%66.27%40
24 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:09.0 +0:03.5+63.64%61.11%29
25 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:45.0 +0:39.5+718.18%12.22%33
26 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.2 +0:54.7+994.55%9.14%49
27 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.6 +0:55.1+1001.82%9.08%45
28 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.7 +0:55.2+1003.64%9.06%42
29 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.8 +0:55.3+1005.45%9.05%19
30 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.0 +0:55.5+1009.09%9.02%48
31 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.3 +0:55.8+1014.55%8.97%43
32 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.5 +0:56.0+1018.18%8.94%44
32 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.5 +0:56.0+1018.18%8.94%46
34 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.6 +0:56.1+1020.00%8.93%51
35 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.7 +0:56.2+1021.82%8.91%58
35 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 1:01.7 +0:56.2+1021.82%8.91%66
37 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.8 +0:56.3+1023.64%8.90%50
38 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:02.6 +0:57.1+1038.18%8.79%61
39 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 1:03.7 +0:58.2+1058.18%8.63%50
40 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:04.1 +0:58.6+1065.45%8.58%47
41 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 1:04.2 +0:58.7+1067.27%8.57%95
42 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:06.4 +1:00.9+1107.27%8.28%6
43 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:08.2 +1:02.7+1140.00%8.06%64
44 81 Joshua Hansen   40 to 44 41 M 1:18.8 +1:13.3+1332.73%6.98%10
45 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:48.8 +1:43.3+1878.18%5.06%28
46 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:51.2 +1:45.7+1921.82%4.95%1
47 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:51.8 +1:46.3+1932.73%4.92%2
48 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:55.1 +1:49.6+1992.73%4.78%13
49 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:57.5 +1:52.0+2036.36%4.68%3
50 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:58.9 +1:53.4+2061.82%4.63%4
51 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:01.5 +1:56.0+2109.09%4.53%7
52 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.2 +1:56.7+2121.82%4.50%11
53 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.3 +1:56.8+2123.64%4.50%6
54 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.6 +1:57.1+2129.09%4.49%5
55 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:03.0 +1:57.5+2136.36%4.47%12
56 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:03.5 +1:58.0+2145.45%4.45%1
57 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:05.3 +1:59.8+2178.18%4.39%14
58 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:05.4 +1:59.9+2180.00%4.39%3
59 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:05.9 +2:00.4+2189.09%4.37%13
60 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:06.0 +2:00.5+2190.91%4.37%2
61 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:06.8 +2:01.3+2205.45%4.34%5
62 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:07.0 +2:01.5+2209.09%4.33%7
63 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.0 +2:01.5+2209.09%4.33%8
64 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.1 +2:01.6+2210.91%4.33%10
65 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.1 +2:01.6+2210.91%4.33%9
66 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:07.6 +2:02.1+2220.00%4.31%4
67 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:07.8 +2:02.3+2223.64%4.30%18
68 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:08.2 +2:02.7+2230.91%4.29%15
69 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.3 +2:02.8+2232.73%4.29%19
70 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.5 +2:03.0+2236.36%4.28%3
71 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:08.7 +2:03.2+2240.00%4.27%56
72 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.8 +2:03.3+2241.82%4.27%6
73 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:08.9 +2:03.4+2243.64%4.27%53
74 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.0 +2:03.5+2245.45%4.26%11
75 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:09.1 +2:03.6+2247.27%4.26%17
76 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.4 +2:03.9+2252.73%4.25%8
77 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:09.6 +2:04.1+2256.36%4.24%43
78 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.6 +2:04.1+2256.36%4.24%6
79 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.0 +2:04.5+2263.64%4.23%8
80 46 Monte Riding West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:10.1 +2:04.6+2265.45%4.23%31
81 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.3 +2:04.8+2269.09%4.22%24
82 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270.91%4.22%7
83 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270.91%4.22%4
84 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.7 +2:05.2+2276.36%4.21%22
85 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.7 +2:05.2+2276.36%4.21%40
86 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.1 +2:05.6+2283.64%4.20%5
87 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285.45%4.19%46
88 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.4 +2:05.9+2289.09%4.19%17
89 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.5 +2:06.0+2290.91%4.18%47
90 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292.73%4.18%23
91 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292.73%4.18%21
92 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.7 +2:06.2+2294.55%4.18%20
93 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296.36%4.17%14
94 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:11.9 +2:06.4+2298.18%4.17%23
95 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.2 +2:06.7+2303.64%4.16%11
96 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.3 +2:06.8+2305.45%4.16%32
97 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:12.4 +2:06.9+2307.27%4.15%23
98 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.4 +2:06.9+2307.27%4.15%48
99 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.5 +2:07.0+2309.09%4.15%28
100 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.6 +2:07.1+2310.91%4.15%21
101 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.7 +2:07.2+2312.73%4.14%15
102 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.9 +2:07.4+2316.36%4.14%41
103 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.9 +2:07.4+2316.36%4.14%29
104 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.2 +2:07.6+2320.00%4.13%19
105 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%33
106 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%24
107 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%22
108 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%9
109 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%18
110 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:13.4 +2:07.9+2325.45%4.12%23
111 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:13.9 +2:08.4+2334.55%4.11%9
112 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.0 +2:08.5+2336.36%4.10%12
113 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.0 +2:08.5+2336.36%4.10%36
114 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.1 +2:08.6+2338.18%4.10%17
115 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.2 +2:08.6+2338.18%4.10%10
116 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.2 +2:08.7+2340.00%4.10%25
117 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.2 +2:08.7+2340.00%4.10%14
118 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.5 +2:09.0+2345.45%4.09%13
119 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:14.5 +2:09.0+2345.45%4.09%10
120 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:14.6 +2:09.1+2347.27%4.09%16
121 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.6 +2:09.1+2347.27%4.09%10
122 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.7 +2:09.2+2349.09%4.08%2
123 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:15.0 +2:09.5+2354.55%4.07%25
124 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358.18%4.07%12
125 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358.18%4.07%42
126 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358.18%4.07%1
127 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.3 +2:09.8+2360.00%4.07%38
128 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:15.7 +2:10.2+2367.27%4.05%9
129 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:15.7 +2:10.2+2367.27%4.05%13
130 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.9 +2:10.4+2370.91%4.05%34
131 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.0 +2:10.5+2372.73%4.04%20
132 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:16.1 +2:10.6+2374.55%4.04%26
133 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.1 +2:10.6+2374.55%4.04%6
134 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:16.3 +2:10.8+2378.18%4.04%102
135 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.4 +2:10.9+2380.00%4.03%8
136 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:16.5 +2:11.0+2381.82%4.03%37
137 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:17.1 +2:11.6+2392.73%4.01%13
138 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:17.2 +2:11.7+2394.55%4.01%12
139 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401.82%4.00%44
140 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401.82%4.00%11
141 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401.82%4.00%16
142 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:17.7 +2:12.2+2403.64%3.99%4
143 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.8 +2:12.3+2405.45%3.99%30
144 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.8 +2:12.3+2405.45%3.99%31
145 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:17.9 +2:12.4+2407.27%3.99%7
146 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:18.5 +2:13.0+2418.18%3.97%21
147 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.3 +2:13.8+2432.73%3.95%5
148 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434.55%3.95%4
148 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434.55%3.95%19
150 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:20.7 +2:15.2+2458.18%3.91%27
151 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:21.6 +2:16.1+2474.55%3.88%18
152 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:21.8 +2:16.3+2478.18%3.88%14
153 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:22.1 +2:16.6+2483.64%3.87%16
154 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:22.3 +2:16.8+2487.27%3.87%63
155 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:22.4 +2:16.9+2489.09%3.86%3
156 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:22.8 +2:17.3+2496.36%3.85%26
157 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501.82%3.84%20
158 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:23.8 +2:18.3+2514.55%3.82%26
159 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516.36%3.82%17
160 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.2 +2:18.7+2521.82%3.81%18
161 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.3 +2:18.8+2523.64%3.81%19
162 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.7 +2:19.2+2530.91%3.80%17
163 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.9 +2:19.4+2534.55%3.80%15
164 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540.00%3.79%19
165 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:25.7 +2:20.2+2549.09%3.77%5
166 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:25.8 +2:20.3+2550.91%3.77%18
167 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:26.1 +2:20.6+2556.36%3.76%96
168 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:26.1 +2:20.6+2556.36%3.76%27
169 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:26.3 +2:20.8+2560.00%3.76%16
170 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:26.4 +2:20.9+2561.82%3.76%20
171 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:26.4 +2:20.9+2561.82%3.76%5
172 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:26.8 +2:21.3+2569.09%3.75%6
173 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:27.2 +2:21.7+2576.36%3.74%2
174 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:27.3 +2:21.8+2578.18%3.73%49
175 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:27.4 +2:21.9+2580.00%3.73%28
176 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:28.0 +2:22.5+2590.91%3.72%22
177 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:28.4 +2:22.9+2598.18%3.71%9
178 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:28.5 +2:23.0+2600.00%3.70%4
179 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601.82%3.70%29
180 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601.82%3.70%4
180 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601.82%3.70%6
182 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:28.9 +2:23.4+2607.27%3.69%3
183 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:29.3 +2:23.8+2614.55%3.68%16
184 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:29.5 +2:24.0+2618.18%3.68%10
185 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:29.6 +2:24.1+2620.00%3.68%23
186 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:30.0 +2:24.5+2627.27%3.67%8
187 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:30.3 +2:24.8+2632.73%3.66%1
188 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:30.8 +2:25.3+2641.82%3.65%21
189 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:30.9 +2:25.4+2643.64%3.64%7
190 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:31.0 +2:25.5+2645.45%3.64%30
191 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:31.2 +2:25.7+2649.09%3.64%31
192 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:31.3 +2:25.8+2650.91%3.64%45
193 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:31.7 +2:26.2+2658.18%3.63%7
194 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:32.0 +2:26.5+2663.64%3.62%96
195 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:32.0 +2:26.5+2663.64%3.62%6
196 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:32.2 +2:26.7+2667.27%3.61%11
197 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:32.5 +2:27.0+2672.73%3.61%2
198 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:32.7 +2:27.2+2676.36%3.60%3
199 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:33.3 +2:27.8+2687.27%3.59%12
200 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:34.0 +2:28.5+2700.00%3.57%11
201 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.5 +2:29.0+2709.09%3.56%12
202 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.6 +2:29.1+2710.91%3.56%2
203 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712.73%3.56%59
204 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712.73%3.56%48
205 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.8 +2:29.3+2714.55%3.55%13
206 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:35.6 +2:30.1+2729.09%3.53%35
207 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:35.7 +2:30.2+2730.91%3.53%43
208 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736.36%3.53%50
208 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736.36%3.53%59
210 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:36.2 +2:30.7+2740.00%3.52%27
211 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:36.4 +2:30.9+2743.64%3.52%3
212 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:36.9 +2:31.4+2752.73%3.51%22
213 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:37.2 +2:31.7+2758.18%3.50%16
214 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760.00%3.50%58
215 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760.00%3.50%1
215 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760.00%3.50%15
217 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:37.8 +2:32.3+2769.09%3.49%8
218 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:38.1 +2:32.6+2774.55%3.48%31
219 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:38.1 +2:32.6+2774.55%3.48%25
220 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:38.2 +2:32.7+2776.36%3.48%47
221 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:38.3 +2:32.8+2778.18%3.47%3
221 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:38.3 +2:32.8+2778.18%3.47%16
223 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:38.4 +2:32.9+2780.00%3.47%6
224 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:38.7 +2:33.2+2785.45%3.47%60
225 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:38.8 +2:33.3+2787.27%3.46%30
226 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:39.0 +2:33.5+2790.91%3.46%76
227 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:39.1 +2:33.6+2792.73%3.46%36
228 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:39.3 +2:33.8+2796.36%3.45%18
229 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:39.4 +2:33.9+2798.18%3.45%26
230 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:39.4 +2:33.9+2798.18%3.45%89
231 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:39.5 +2:34.0+2800.00%3.45%17
232 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:39.5 +2:34.0+2800.00%3.45%9
233 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:39.6 +2:34.1+2801.82%3.45%2
234 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:39.6 +2:34.1+2801.82%3.45%25
235 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:39.7 +2:34.2+2803.64%3.44%47
236 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:39.9 +2:34.4+2807.27%3.44%40
237 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:39.9 +2:34.4+2807.27%3.44%21
238 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:39.9 +2:34.4+2807.27%3.44%24
239 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:40.0 +2:34.5+2809.09%3.44%39
240 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.0 +2:34.5+2809.09%3.44%38
241 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.2 +2:34.7+2812.73%3.43%13
242 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.5 +2:35.0+2818.18%3.43%33
243 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.5 +2:35.0+2818.18%3.43%50
244 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.5 +2:35.0+2818.18%3.43%20
245 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:40.6 +2:35.1+2820.00%3.42%50
246 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.8 +2:35.2+2821.82%3.42%40
247 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:40.9 +2:35.4+2825.45%3.42%28
248 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:40.9 +2:35.4+2825.45%3.42%55
249 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:40.9 +2:35.4+2825.45%3.42%44
250 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:41.1 +2:35.6+2829.09%3.41%30
251 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:41.1 +2:35.6+2829.09%3.41%16
252 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:41.1 +2:35.6+2829.09%3.41%51
253 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:41.1 +2:35.6+2829.09%3.41%63
254 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:41.3 +2:35.8+2832.73%3.41%33
255 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:41.3 +2:35.8+2832.73%3.41%7
256 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:41.4 +2:35.9+2834.55%3.41%19
257 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:41.4 +2:35.9+2834.55%3.41%4
258 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:41.6 +2:36.1+2838.18%3.40%39
259 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:41.6 +2:36.1+2838.18%3.40%94
260 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:41.7 +2:36.2+2840.00%3.40%49
261 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:41.8 +2:36.3+2841.82%3.40%26
262 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:41.8 +2:36.3+2841.82%3.40%54
263 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:42.0 +2:36.5+2845.45%3.40%18
264 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:42.0 +2:36.5+2845.45%3.40%32
265 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:42.1 +2:36.6+2847.27%3.39%7
266 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:42.3 +2:36.8+2850.91%3.39%35
267 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:42.3 +2:36.8+2850.91%3.39%88
268 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:42.3 +2:36.8+2850.91%3.39%15
269 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:42.5 +2:37.0+2854.55%3.38%42
270 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:42.7 +2:37.2+2858.18%3.38%27
271 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:42.7 +2:37.2+2858.18%3.38%1
272 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:42.7 +2:37.2+2858.18%3.38%21
272 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:42.7 +2:37.2+2858.18%3.38%58
272 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:42.7 +2:37.2+2858.18%3.38%101
275 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:42.7 +2:37.2+2858.18%3.38%14
276 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:42.8 +2:37.3+2860.00%3.38%40
277 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:42.8 +2:37.3+2860.00%3.38%31
278 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:43.1 +2:37.6+2865.45%3.37%6
279 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:43.1 +2:37.6+2865.45%3.37%19
280 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:43.2 +2:37.7+2867.27%3.37%77
281 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:43.2 +2:37.7+2867.27%3.37%38
282 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:43.4 +2:37.9+2870.91%3.37%56
283 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:43.4 +2:37.9+2870.91%3.37%4
284 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:43.5 +2:38.0+2872.73%3.36%54
285 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:43.6 +2:38.1+2874.55%3.36%33
286 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:43.6 +2:38.1+2874.55%3.36%7
287 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:43.8 +2:38.3+2878.18%3.36%39
288 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:43.8 +2:38.3+2878.18%3.36%26
289 46 Monte Riding West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:44.0 +2:38.5+2881.82%3.35%30
290 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:44.1 +2:38.6+2883.64%3.35%34
291 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:44.3 +2:38.8+2887.27%3.35%13
292 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:44.4 +2:38.9+2889.09%3.35%22
293 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:44.4 +2:38.9+2889.09%3.35%23
294 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:44.5 +2:39.0+2890.91%3.34%49
295 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:44.8 +2:39.3+2896.36%3.34%22
296 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:44.9 +2:39.4+2898.18%3.34%37
297 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:44.9 +2:39.4+2898.18%3.34%39
298 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:44.9 +2:39.4+2898.18%3.34%67
299 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:45.0 +2:39.5+2900.00%3.33%4
300 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:45.0 +2:39.5+2900.00%3.33%41
301 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:45.1 +2:39.6+2901.82%3.33%43
302 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:45.3 +2:39.8+2905.45%3.33%28
303 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:45.4 +2:39.9+2907.27%3.33%55
304 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:45.4 +2:39.9+2907.27%3.33%6
305 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:45.5 +2:40.0+2909.09%3.32%22
306 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:45.6 +2:40.1+2910.91%3.32%9
307 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:45.6 +2:40.1+2910.91%3.32%8
308 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:45.6 +2:40.1+2910.91%3.32%43
309 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:45.7 +2:40.2+2912.73%3.32%14
310 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:45.8 +2:40.3+2914.55%3.32%72
311 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:45.9 +2:40.4+2916.36%3.32%25
312 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:46.0 +2:40.5+2918.18%3.31%5
313 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:46.2 +2:40.7+2921.82%3.31%74
314 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:46.3 +2:40.8+2923.64%3.31%66
315 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:46.3 +2:40.8+2923.64%3.31%28
316 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:46.4 +2:40.9+2925.45%3.31%31
317 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:46.5 +2:41.0+2927.27%3.30%6
318 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:46.5 +2:41.0+2927.27%3.30%21
319 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:46.6 +2:41.1+2929.09%3.30%46
320 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:46.7 +2:41.2+2930.91%3.30%37
321 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:46.8 +2:41.3+2932.73%3.30%8
322 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:46.9 +2:41.4+2934.55%3.30%5
323 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:47.0 +2:41.5+2936.36%3.29%4
323 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:47.0 +2:41.5+2936.36%3.29%21
325 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:47.0 +2:41.5+2936.36%3.29%47
326 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:47.2 +2:41.7+2940.00%3.29%24
326 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:47.2 +2:41.7+2940.00%3.29%26
328 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:47.3 +2:41.8+2941.82%3.29%15
328 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:47.3 +2:41.8+2941.82%3.29%16
330 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:47.4 +2:41.9+2943.64%3.29%17
331 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:47.5 +2:42.0+2945.45%3.28%30
332 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:47.5 +2:42.0+2945.45%3.28%32
333 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:47.7 +2:42.2+2949.09%3.28%19
334 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:47.7 +2:42.2+2949.09%3.28%14
334 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:47.7 +2:42.2+2949.09%3.28%29
336 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:47.8 +2:42.3+2950.91%3.28%31
337 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:47.9 +2:42.4+2952.73%3.28%27
338 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:48.0 +2:42.5+2954.55%3.27%5
339 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:48.0 +2:42.5+2954.55%3.27%9
339 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:48.0 +2:42.5+2954.55%3.27%13
339 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:48.0 +2:42.5+2954.55%3.27%17
342 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:48.0 +2:42.5+2954.55%3.27%22
343 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:48.1 +2:42.6+2956.36%3.27%46
344 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:48.1 +2:42.6+2956.36%3.27%5
345 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:48.2 +2:42.7+2958.18%3.27%38
346 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:48.4 +2:42.9+2961.82%3.27%3
346 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:48.4 +2:42.9+2961.82%3.27%19
348 5 Joel Buschmann Woods Cross, UT  35 to 39 35 M 2:48.4 +2:42.9+2961.82%3.27%2
349 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:48.5 +2:43.0+2963.64%3.26%26
350 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:48.6 +2:43.1+2965.45%3.26%58
351 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:48.7 +2:43.2+2967.27%3.26%14
352 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:48.7 +2:43.2+2967.27%3.26%18
353 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:48.9 +2:43.4+2970.91%3.26%45
354 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:48.9 +2:43.4+2970.91%3.26%34
355 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:49.0 +2:43.5+2972.73%3.25%7
355 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:49.0 +2:43.5+2972.73%3.25%20
357 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:49.1 +2:43.6+2974.55%3.25%10
357 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:49.1 +2:43.6+2974.55%3.25%41
359 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:49.2 +2:43.7+2976.36%3.25%12
360 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:49.3 +2:43.8+2978.18%3.25%10
361 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:49.3 +2:43.8+2978.18%3.25%25
362 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:49.4 +2:43.9+2980.00%3.25%17
362 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:49.4 +2:43.9+2980.00%3.25%32
364 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:49.4 +2:43.9+2980.00%3.25%54
365 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:49.4 +2:43.9+2980.00%3.25%69
366 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:49.5 +2:44.0+2981.82%3.24%17
367 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:49.5 +2:44.0+2981.82%3.24%13
368 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:49.5 +2:44.0+2981.82%3.24%48
369 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:49.6 +2:44.1+2983.64%3.24%27
370 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:49.8 +2:44.3+2987.27%3.24%8
371 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:50.0 +2:44.5+2990.91%3.24%44
372 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:50.1 +2:44.6+2992.73%3.23%29
373 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:50.1 +2:44.6+2992.73%3.23%4
373 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:50.1 +2:44.6+2992.73%3.23%12
375 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:50.1 +2:44.6+2992.73%3.23%15
376 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:50.1 +2:44.6+2992.73%3.23%42
377 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:50.2 +2:44.7+2994.55%3.23%100
378 57 Brian Taylor Pleasant Grove, UT  35 to 39 37 M 2:50.2 +2:44.7+2994.55%3.23%44
379 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:50.2 +2:44.7+2994.55%3.23%18
379 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:50.2 +2:44.7+2994.55%3.23%35
381 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:50.2 +2:44.7+2994.55%3.23%52
382 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:50.3 +2:44.8+2996.36%3.23%75
383 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:50.3 +2:44.8+2996.36%3.23%2
383 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:50.3 +2:44.8+2996.36%3.23%3
383 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:50.3 +2:44.8+2996.36%3.23%15
383 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:50.3 +2:44.8+2996.36%3.23%22
383 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:50.3 +2:44.8+2996.36%3.23%90
388 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:50.4 +2:44.9+2998.18%3.23%15
389 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:50.5 +2:45.0+3000.00%3.23%9
390 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:50.6 +2:45.1+3001.82%3.22%12
391 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:50.8 +2:45.3+3005.45%3.22%62
392 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:50.9 +2:45.4+3007.27%3.22%9
393 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:51.0 +2:45.5+3009.09%3.22%61
394 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:51.0 +2:45.5+3009.09%3.22%1
395 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:51.1 +2:45.6+3010.91%3.21%2
396 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:51.1 +2:45.6+3010.91%3.21%71
397 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:51.2 +2:45.7+3012.73%3.21%3
398 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:51.2 +2:45.7+3012.73%3.21%30
399 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:51.2 +2:45.7+3012.73%3.21%28
400 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:51.2 +2:45.7+3012.73%3.21%12
401 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:51.3 +2:45.8+3014.55%3.21%73
402 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:51.4 +2:45.9+3016.36%3.21%13
403 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:51.4 +2:45.9+3016.36%3.21%56
404 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:51.5 +2:46.0+3018.18%3.21%7
404 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:51.5 +2:46.0+3018.18%3.21%12
404 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:51.5 +2:46.0+3018.18%3.21%14
407 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:51.7 +2:46.2+3021.82%3.20%12
408 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:51.7 +2:46.2+3021.82%3.20%2
409 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:51.8 +2:46.3+3023.64%3.20%5
410 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:51.8 +2:46.3+3023.64%3.20%57
411 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:51.9 +2:46.4+3025.45%3.20%33
412 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:52.0 +2:46.5+3027.27%3.20%8
412 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:52.0 +2:46.5+3027.27%3.20%33
412 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:52.0 +2:46.5+3027.27%3.20%53
415 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:52.1 +2:46.6+3029.09%3.20%8
416 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:52.2 +2:46.7+3030.91%3.19%27
417 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:52.3 +2:46.8+3032.73%3.19%68
418 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:52.4 +2:46.9+3034.55%3.19%17
419 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:52.4 +2:46.9+3034.55%3.19%36
420 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:52.8 +2:47.3+3041.82%3.18%26
421 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:52.9 +2:47.4+3043.64%3.18%64
422 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:53.1 +2:47.6+3047.27%3.18%29
422 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:53.1 +2:47.6+3047.27%3.18%39
424 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:53.2 +2:47.7+3049.09%3.18%3
424 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:53.2 +2:47.7+3049.09%3.18%7
424 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:53.2 +2:47.7+3049.09%3.18%25
427 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:53.3 +2:47.8+3050.91%3.17%64
428 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:53.3 +2:47.8+3050.91%3.17%21
429 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:53.4 +2:47.9+3052.73%3.17%7
429 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:53.4 +2:47.9+3052.73%3.17%11
429 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:53.4 +2:47.9+3052.73%3.17%11
432 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:53.5 +2:48.0+3054.55%3.17%10
432 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:53.5 +2:48.0+3054.55%3.17%12
432 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:53.5 +2:48.0+3054.55%3.17%23
435 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:53.7 +2:48.2+3058.18%3.17%22
436 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:53.8 +2:48.3+3060.00%3.16%15
437 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:53.9 +2:48.4+3061.82%3.16%22
438 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:54.0 +2:48.5+3063.64%3.16%48
439 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:54.1 +2:48.6+3065.45%3.16%25
440 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:54.2 +2:48.7+3067.27%3.16%35
441 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:54.2 +2:48.7+3067.27%3.16%19
442 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:54.4 +2:48.9+3070.91%3.15%94
443 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:54.4 +2:48.9+3070.91%3.15%34
444 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:54.4 +2:48.9+3070.91%3.15%21
445 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:54.5 +2:49.0+3072.73%3.15%20
446 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:54.6 +2:49.1+3074.55%3.15%9
446 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:54.6 +2:49.1+3074.55%3.15%9
448 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:55.0 +2:49.5+3081.82%3.14%10
449 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:55.0 +2:49.5+3081.82%3.14%23
450 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:55.0 +2:49.5+3081.82%3.14%37
451 20 Matt Hammond Salt Lake City, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:55.1 +2:49.6+3083.64%3.14%3
452 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:55.1 +2:49.6+3083.64%3.14%84
453 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:55.3 +2:49.8+3087.27%3.14%14
454 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:55.4 +2:49.9+3089.09%3.14%18
455 57 Brian Taylor Pleasant Grove, UT  35 to 39 37 M 2:55.4 +2:49.9+3089.09%3.14%8
456 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:55.5 +2:50.0+3090.91%3.13%44
457 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:55.5 +2:50.0+3090.91%3.13%59
458 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:55.7 +2:50.2+3094.55%3.13%51
459 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:55.7 +2:50.2+3094.55%3.13%14
459 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:55.7 +2:50.2+3094.55%3.13%15
459 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:55.7 +2:50.2+3094.55%3.13%25
459 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:55.7 +2:50.2+3094.55%3.13%51
463 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:55.9 +2:50.4+3098.18%3.13%34
463 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:55.9 +2:50.4+3098.18%3.13%43
465 20 Matt Hammond Salt Lake City, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:56.1 +2:50.6+3101.82%3.12%5
466 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:56.2 +2:50.7+3103.64%3.12%93
467 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:56.3 +2:50.8+3105.45%3.12%2
468 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:56.4 +2:50.9+3107.27%3.12%17
469 20 Matt Hammond Salt Lake City, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:56.4 +2:50.9+3107.27%3.12%4
470 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:56.5 +2:51.0+3109.09%3.12%6
471 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:56.7 +2:51.2+3112.73%3.11%1
471 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:56.7 +2:51.2+3112.73%3.11%14
473 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:56.7 +2:51.2+3112.73%3.11%10
474 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:56.9 +2:51.4+3116.36%3.11%1
475 68 Garrett Robison Draper, UT  30 to 34 30 M 2:56.9 +2:51.4+3116.36%3.11%1
475 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:56.9 +2:51.4+3116.36%3.11%16
477 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:57.1 +2:51.6+3120.00%3.11%28
478 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:57.1 +2:51.6+3120.00%3.11%24
479 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:57.1 +2:51.6+3120.00%3.11%24
480 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:57.2 +2:51.7+3121.82%3.10%45
481 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:57.3 +2:51.8+3123.64%3.10%87
482 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:57.4 +2:51.9+3125.45%3.10%38
483 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:57.4 +2:51.9+3125.45%3.10%20
484 57 Brian Taylor Pleasant Grove, UT  35 to 39 37 M 2:57.5 +2:52.0+3127.27%3.10%10
485 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:57.7 +2:52.2+3130.91%3.10%44
486 57 Brian Taylor Pleasant Grove, UT  35 to 39 37 M 2:57.7 +2:52.2+3130.91%3.10%9
487 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:57.8 +2:52.3+3132.73%3.09%79
488 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:57.9 +2:52.4+3134.55%3.09%25
488 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:57.9 +2:52.4+3134.55%3.09%40
490 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:58.0 +2:52.5+3136.36%3.09%47
491 57 Brian Taylor Pleasant Grove, UT  35 to 39 37 M 2:58.0 +2:52.5+3136.36%3.09%14
492 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:58.1 +2:52.6+3138.18%3.09%70
493 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:58.2 +2:52.7+3140.00%3.09%11
493 58 William Thomson Kearns, UT  65 to 69 65 M 2:58.2 +2:52.7+3140.00%3.09%17
493 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:58.2 +2:52.7+3140.00%3.09%61
496 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:58.3 +2:52.8+3141.82%3.08%10
497 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:58.4 +2:52.9+3143.64%3.08%2
498 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:58.5 +2:53.0+3145.45%3.08%16
499 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:58.5 +2:53.0+3145.45%3.08%11
500 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:58.7 +2:53.2+3149.09%3.08%50
Page / 3
Racers per page: