2023 Revolution Run

31. december 2022 7:59 (GMT-7) - Endelige resultater

Race info
Sport: Løb
Beliggenhed: Kearns, UT, USA
View on map
Starttype: Manuel bølgestart
Bølgegruppering: Efter distance
Racers: 36
Omgange: Tidsbegrænset
tid på: LENOVO 82BH
Målt med: Webscorer PRO 6.0
Chip timing: RFID - LLRP
Opdateret: 3. januar 2023 12:56 (GMT-7)

Kontakt arrangør

Brug denne formular til at sende en mail til arrangøren.

Dit navn
Din email adresse
Bekræft email adresse
Besked til arrangør
Send

  • Race vindere »
  • Most Laps in 5 Hours
  • omgangstider
Side / 5
Racers per side:
Sted Startnummer Racer navn Affiliation Kategori Alder Køn omgangstid
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0,00%100,00%32
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0,00%100,00%36
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0,00%100,00%37
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0,00%100,00%46
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0,00%100,00%47
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1,82%98,21%28
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1,82%98,21%34
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1,82%98,21%41
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3,64%96,49%26
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3,64%96,49%31
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3,64%96,49%42
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3,64%96,49%43
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3,64%96,49%48
14 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.8 +0:00.3+5,45%94,83%38
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9,09%91,67%27
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9,09%91,67%35
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9,09%91,67%39
18 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.2 +0:00.7+12,73%88,71%30
19 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.3 +0:00.8+14,55%87,30%49
20 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.7 +0:01.2+21,82%82,09%25
21 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:07.0 +0:01.5+27,27%78,57%44
22 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:08.0 +0:02.5+45,45%68,75%45
23 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:08.3 +0:02.8+50,91%66,27%40
24 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:09.0 +0:03.5+63,64%61,11%29
25 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:45.0 +0:39.5+718,18%12,22%33
26 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.2 +0:54.7+994,55%9,14%49
27 42 Christy Rand West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 47 K 1:00.5 +0:55.0+1000,00%9,09%18
28 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.6 +0:55.1+1001,82%9,08%45
29 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.7 +0:55.2+1003,64%9,06%42
30 42 Christy Rand West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 47 K 1:00.8 +0:55.3+1005,45%9,05%25
31 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.8 +0:55.3+1005,45%9,05%19
32 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.0 +0:55.5+1009,09%9,02%48
33 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.3 +0:55.8+1014,55%8,97%43
34 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.5 +0:56.0+1018,18%8,94%44
34 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.5 +0:56.0+1018,18%8,94%46
36 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.6 +0:56.1+1020,00%8,93%51
37 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.7 +0:56.2+1021,82%8,91%58
37 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 1:01.7 +0:56.2+1021,82%8,91%66
39 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.8 +0:56.3+1023,64%8,90%50
40 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:02.6 +0:57.1+1038,18%8,79%61
41 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 1:03.7 +0:58.2+1058,18%8,63%50
42 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:04.1 +0:58.6+1065,45%8,58%47
43 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 1:04.2 +0:58.7+1067,27%8,57%95
44 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:06.4 +1:00.9+1107,27%8,28%6
45 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:08.2 +1:02.7+1140,00%8,06%64
46 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 K 1:08.3 +1:02.8+1141,82%8,05%45
47 42 Christy Rand West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 47 K 1:13.4 +1:07.9+1234,55%7,49%24
48 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 K 1:15.7 +1:10.2+1276,36%7,27%61
49 81 Joshua Hansen   40 to 44 41 M 1:18.8 +1:13.3+1332,73%6,98%10
50 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 K 1:29.9 +1:24.4+1534,55%6,12%52
51 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:48.8 +1:43.3+1878,18%5,06%28
52 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 K 1:49.9 +1:44.4+1898,18%5,00%62
53 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:51.2 +1:45.7+1921,82%4,95%1
54 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:51.8 +1:46.3+1932,73%4,92%2
55 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:55.1 +1:49.6+1992,73%4,78%13
56 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:57.5 +1:52.0+2036,36%4,68%3
57 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:58.9 +1:53.4+2061,82%4,63%4
58 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 1:59.2 +1:53.7+2067,27%4,61%1
59 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:01.5 +1:56.0+2109,09%4,53%7
60 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.2 +1:56.7+2121,82%4,50%11
61 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.3 +1:56.8+2123,64%4,50%6
62 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.6 +1:57.1+2129,09%4,49%5
63 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 K 2:02.6 +1:57.1+2129,09%4,49%58
64 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:03.0 +1:57.5+2136,36%4,47%12
65 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 K 2:03.2 +1:57.7+2140,00%4,46%60
66 17 Cathi Gridley Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:03.2 +1:57.7+2140,00%4,46%80
67 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:03.5 +1:58.0+2145,45%4,45%1
68 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:05.3 +1:59.8+2178,18%4,39%14
69 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:05.4 +1:59.9+2180,00%4,39%3
70 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:05.9 +2:00.4+2189,09%4,37%13
71 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:06.0 +2:00.5+2190,91%4,37%2
72 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:06.7 +2:01.2+2203,64%4,34%4
73 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:06.8 +2:01.3+2205,45%4,34%5
74 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:07.0 +2:01.5+2209,09%4,33%7
75 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.0 +2:01.5+2209,09%4,33%8
76 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.1 +2:01.6+2210,91%4,33%10
77 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.1 +2:01.6+2210,91%4,33%9
78 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:07.3 +2:01.8+2214,55%4,32%6
79 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:07.6 +2:02.1+2220,00%4,31%4
80 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:07.8 +2:02.3+2223,64%4,30%18
81 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:08.2 +2:02.7+2230,91%4,29%15
82 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.3 +2:02.8+2232,73%4,29%19
83 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.5 +2:03.0+2236,36%4,28%3
84 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:08.7 +2:03.2+2240,00%4,27%56
85 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.8 +2:03.3+2241,82%4,27%6
86 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:08.9 +2:03.4+2243,64%4,27%53
87 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.0 +2:03.5+2245,45%4,26%11
88 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:09.1 +2:03.6+2247,27%4,26%17
89 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:09.3 +2:03.8+2250,91%4,25%2
90 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:09.4 +2:03.9+2252,73%4,25%3
91 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.4 +2:03.9+2252,73%4,25%8
92 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:09.6 +2:04.1+2256,36%4,24%43
93 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.6 +2:04.1+2256,36%4,24%6
94 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:09.8 +2:04.3+2260,00%4,24%5
95 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.0 +2:04.5+2263,64%4,23%8
96 46 Monte Riding West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:10.1 +2:04.6+2265,45%4,23%31
97 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.3 +2:04.8+2269,09%4,22%24
98 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270,91%4,22%7
99 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270,91%4,22%4
100 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270,91%4,22%14
101 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.7 +2:05.2+2276,36%4,21%22
102 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.7 +2:05.2+2276,36%4,21%40
103 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.1 +2:05.6+2283,64%4,20%5
104 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285,45%4,19%46
105 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285,45%4,19%16
105 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285,45%4,19%20
107 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.4 +2:05.9+2289,09%4,19%17
108 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.5 +2:06.0+2290,91%4,18%47
109 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:11.5 +2:06.0+2290,91%4,18%19
110 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292,73%4,18%13
110 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292,73%4,18%18
110 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292,73%4,18%23
113 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292,73%4,18%21
114 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.7 +2:06.2+2294,55%4,18%20
115 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:11.7 +2:06.2+2294,55%4,18%23
116 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296,36%4,17%17
116 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296,36%4,17%22
118 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296,36%4,17%14
119 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:11.9 +2:06.4+2298,18%4,17%23
120 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:12.0 +2:06.5+2300,00%4,17%15
121 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:12.1 +2:06.6+2301,82%4,16%21
122 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.2 +2:06.7+2303,64%4,16%11
123 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.3 +2:06.8+2305,45%4,16%32
124 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:12.4 +2:06.9+2307,27%4,15%23
125 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.4 +2:06.9+2307,27%4,15%48
126 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.5 +2:07.0+2309,09%4,15%28
127 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.6 +2:07.1+2310,91%4,15%21
128 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.7 +2:07.2+2312,73%4,14%15
129 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:12.8 +2:07.3+2314,55%4,14%8
130 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.9 +2:07.4+2316,36%4,14%41
131 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.9 +2:07.4+2316,36%4,14%29
132 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:13.1 +2:07.6+2320,00%4,13%9
133 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.2 +2:07.6+2320,00%4,13%19
134 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323,64%4,13%33
135 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323,64%4,13%24
136 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323,64%4,13%22
137 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323,64%4,13%9
138 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323,64%4,13%18
139 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:13.4 +2:07.9+2325,45%4,12%23
140 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:13.7 +2:08.2+2330,91%4,11%7
141 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:13.9 +2:08.4+2334,55%4,11%9
142 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.0 +2:08.5+2336,36%4,10%12
143 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.0 +2:08.5+2336,36%4,10%36
144 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.1 +2:08.6+2338,18%4,10%17
145 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.2 +2:08.6+2338,18%4,10%10
146 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.2 +2:08.7+2340,00%4,10%25
147 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.2 +2:08.7+2340,00%4,10%14
148 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:14.3 +2:08.8+2341,82%4,10%12
149 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:14.4 +2:08.9+2343,64%4,09%12
150 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.5 +2:09.0+2345,45%4,09%13
151 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:14.5 +2:09.0+2345,45%4,09%10
152 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:14.6 +2:09.1+2347,27%4,09%16
153 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.6 +2:09.1+2347,27%4,09%10
154 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.7 +2:09.2+2349,09%4,08%2
155 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:15.0 +2:09.5+2354,55%4,07%25
156 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:15.0 +2:09.5+2354,55%4,07%24
157 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358,18%4,07%12
158 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358,18%4,07%42
159 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358,18%4,07%1
160 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.3 +2:09.8+2360,00%4,07%38
161 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:15.3 +2:09.8+2360,00%4,07%120
162 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:15.7 +2:10.2+2367,27%4,05%9
163 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:15.7 +2:10.2+2367,27%4,05%13
164 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.9 +2:10.4+2370,91%4,05%34
165 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.0 +2:10.5+2372,73%4,04%20
166 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:16.0 +2:10.5+2372,73%4,04%6
167 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:16.1 +2:10.6+2374,55%4,04%26
168 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.1 +2:10.6+2374,55%4,04%6
169 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:16.3 +2:10.8+2378,18%4,04%102
170 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.4 +2:10.9+2380,00%4,03%8
171 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:16.5 +2:11.0+2381,82%4,03%37
172 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:17.1 +2:11.6+2392,73%4,01%13
173 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:17.2 +2:11.7+2394,55%4,01%12
174 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:17.5 +2:12.0+2400,00%4,00%10
175 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:17.5 +2:12.0+2400,00%4,00%121
176 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401,82%4,00%44
177 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401,82%4,00%11
178 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401,82%4,00%16
179 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:17.7 +2:12.2+2403,64%3,99%4
180 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.8 +2:12.3+2405,45%3,99%30
181 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.8 +2:12.3+2405,45%3,99%31
182 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:17.9 +2:12.4+2407,27%3,99%7
183 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:17.9 +2:12.4+2407,27%3,99%7
184 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:18.1 +2:12.6+2410,91%3,98%24
185 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:18.2 +2:12.7+2412,73%3,98%22
186 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:18.5 +2:13.0+2418,18%3,97%21
187 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:18.6 +2:13.1+2420,00%3,97%27
188 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:18.9 +2:13.4+2425,45%3,96%9
189 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:19.1 +2:13.6+2429,09%3,95%4
190 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.3 +2:13.8+2432,73%3,95%5
191 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:19.3 +2:13.8+2432,73%3,95%23
192 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434,55%3,95%5
193 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434,55%3,95%10
194 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434,55%3,95%4
194 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434,55%3,95%19
196 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:19.5 +2:14.0+2436,36%3,94%8
197 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:19.6 +2:14.1+2438,18%3,94%28
197 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:19.6 +2:14.1+2438,18%3,94%29
199 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:19.9 +2:14.4+2443,64%3,93%11
200 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:20.2 +2:14.7+2449,09%3,92%14
201 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:20.2 +2:14.7+2449,09%3,92%32
202 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:20.3 +2:14.8+2450,91%3,92%16
203 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:20.3 +2:14.8+2450,91%3,92%17
204 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:20.7 +2:15.2+2458,18%3,91%27
205 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:20.8 +2:15.3+2460,00%3,91%15
206 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:20.9 +2:15.4+2461,82%3,90%21
207 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:21.3 +2:15.8+2469,09%3,89%20
208 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:21.5 +2:16.0+2472,73%3,89%34
209 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:21.5 +2:16.0+2472,73%3,89%38
210 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:21.6 +2:16.1+2474,55%3,88%18
211 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:21.7 +2:16.2+2476,36%3,88%31
212 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:21.7 +2:16.2+2476,36%3,88%18
213 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:21.8 +2:16.3+2478,18%3,88%1
214 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:21.8 +2:16.3+2478,18%3,88%14
215 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:21.9 +2:16.4+2480,00%3,88%42
216 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:22.1 +2:16.6+2483,64%3,87%30
217 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:22.1 +2:16.6+2483,64%3,87%16
218 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:22.3 +2:16.8+2487,27%3,87%63
219 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:22.4 +2:16.9+2489,09%3,86%19
220 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:22.4 +2:16.9+2489,09%3,86%3
221 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:22.5 +2:17.0+2490,91%3,86%27
222 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:22.6 +2:17.1+2492,73%3,86%3
223 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:22.6 +2:17.1+2492,73%3,86%44
224 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:22.8 +2:17.3+2496,36%3,85%26
224 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:22.8 +2:17.3+2496,36%3,85%26
226 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:22.8 +2:17.4+2498,18%3,85%25
227 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501,82%3,84%33
228 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501,82%3,84%20
229 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501,82%3,84%41
230 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:23.4 +2:17.9+2507,27%3,84%36
231 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:23.6 +2:18.1+2510,91%3,83%28
232 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:23.6 +2:18.1+2510,91%3,83%38
233 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:23.6 +2:18.1+2510,91%3,83%26
234 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:23.7 +2:18.2+2512,73%3,83%37
234 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:23.7 +2:18.2+2512,73%3,83%50
236 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:23.8 +2:18.3+2514,55%3,82%29
237 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:23.8 +2:18.3+2514,55%3,82%26
238 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516,36%3,82%17
238 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516,36%3,82%35
240 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516,36%3,82%40
241 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:24.1 +2:18.6+2520,00%3,82%47
242 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:24.1 +2:18.6+2520,00%3,82%35
243 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.2 +2:18.7+2521,82%3,81%18
244 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.3 +2:18.8+2523,64%3,81%19
245 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:24.3 +2:18.8+2523,64%3,81%37
246 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:24.4 +2:18.9+2525,45%3,81%48
247 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:24.5 +2:19.0+2527,27%3,81%52
248 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:24.5 +2:19.0+2527,27%3,81%2
249 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:24.7 +2:19.2+2530,91%3,80%43
250 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.7 +2:19.2+2530,91%3,80%17
251 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:24.8 +2:19.3+2532,73%3,80%45
252 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.9 +2:19.4+2534,55%3,80%15
253 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:25.1 +2:19.6+2538,18%3,79%28
254 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:25.1 +2:19.6+2538,18%3,79%13
255 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:25.1 +2:19.6+2538,18%3,79%36
256 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:25.1 +2:19.6+2538,18%3,79%25
257 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540,00%3,79%19
257 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540,00%3,79%33
257 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540,00%3,79%39
257 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540,00%3,79%42
261 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540,00%3,79%30
262 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:25.3 +2:19.8+2541,82%3,79%40
263 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:25.3 +2:19.8+2541,82%3,79%31
264 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:25.5 +2:20.0+2545,45%3,78%34
265 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:25.6 +2:20.1+2547,27%3,78%29
266 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:25.6 +2:20.1+2547,27%3,78%60
267 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:25.7 +2:20.2+2549,09%3,77%5
268 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:25.8 +2:20.3+2550,91%3,77%39
269 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:25.8 +2:20.3+2550,91%3,77%1
270 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:25.8 +2:20.3+2550,91%3,77%18
271 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:25.8 +2:20.3+2550,91%3,77%59
272 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:26.0 +2:20.5+2554,55%3,77%41
273 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:26.1 +2:20.6+2556,36%3,76%96
274 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:26.1 +2:20.6+2556,36%3,76%27
275 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:26.2 +2:20.7+2558,18%3,76%90
276 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:26.3 +2:20.8+2560,00%3,76%16
277 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:26.4 +2:20.9+2561,82%3,76%20
278 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:26.4 +2:20.9+2561,82%3,76%5
279 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:26.5 +2:21.0+2563,64%3,75%46
280 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:26.5 +2:21.0+2563,64%3,75%55
281 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:26.6 +2:21.1+2565,45%3,75%65
282 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:26.6 +2:21.1+2565,45%3,75%72
283 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:26.7 +2:21.2+2567,27%3,75%18
284 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:26.7 +2:21.2+2567,27%3,75%69
285 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:26.8 +2:21.3+2569,09%3,75%44
286 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:26.8 +2:21.3+2569,09%3,75%6
287 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:26.9 +2:21.4+2570,91%3,74%53
288 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:26.9 +2:21.4+2570,91%3,74%24
289 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:27.0 +2:21.5+2572,73%3,74%56
290 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:27.0 +2:21.5+2572,73%3,74%68
291 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:27.1 +2:21.6+2574,55%3,74%54
292 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:27.2 +2:21.7+2576,36%3,74%2
293 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:27.2 +2:21.7+2576,36%3,74%66
294 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:27.2 +2:21.7+2576,36%3,74%51
295 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:27.3 +2:21.8+2578,18%3,73%49
296 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:27.4 +2:21.9+2580,00%3,73%28
297 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:27.5 +2:22.0+2581,82%3,73%70
298 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:27.5 +2:22.0+2581,82%3,73%61
299 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:27.6 +2:22.1+2583,64%3,73%64
300 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:27.7 +2:22.2+2585,45%3,72%2
301 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:27.7 +2:22.2+2585,45%3,72%22
302 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:27.8 +2:22.3+2587,27%3,72%71
303 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:27.9 +2:22.4+2589,09%3,72%20
304 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:27.9 +2:22.4+2589,09%3,72%73
305 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:28.0 +2:22.5+2590,91%3,72%22
306 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:28.0 +2:22.5+2590,91%3,72%117
307 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:28.1 +2:22.6+2592,73%3,71%21
308 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:28.2 +2:22.7+2594,55%3,71%32
309 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:28.2 +2:22.7+2594,55%3,71%92
310 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:28.3 +2:22.8+2596,36%3,71%46
311 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:28.4 +2:22.9+2598,18%3,71%9
312 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:28.4 +2:22.9+2598,18%3,71%77
313 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:28.4 +2:22.9+2598,18%3,71%49
314 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:28.4 +2:22.9+2598,18%3,71%19
315 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:28.5 +2:23.0+2600,00%3,70%33
316 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:28.5 +2:23.0+2600,00%3,70%4
317 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:28.5 +2:23.0+2600,00%3,70%63
318 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601,82%3,70%29
319 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601,82%3,70%4
319 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601,82%3,70%6
321 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601,82%3,70%80
322 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:28.7 +2:23.2+2603,64%3,70%81
323 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:28.8 +2:23.3+2605,45%3,70%89
324 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:28.9 +2:23.4+2607,27%3,69%30
325 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:28.9 +2:23.4+2607,27%3,69%3
326 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:29.1 +2:23.6+2610,91%3,69%43
327 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:29.2 +2:23.7+2612,73%3,69%47
328 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:29.2 +2:23.7+2612,73%3,69%119
329 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:29.2 +2:23.7+2612,73%3,69%82
330 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:29.2 +2:23.7+2612,73%3,69%36
331 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:29.3 +2:23.8+2614,55%3,68%16
332 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:29.4 +2:23.9+2616,36%3,68%116
333 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:29.5 +2:24.0+2618,18%3,68%10
333 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:29.5 +2:24.0+2618,18%3,68%45
335 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:29.5 +2:24.0+2618,18%3,68%31
336 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:29.6 +2:24.1+2620,00%3,68%88
337 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 K 2:29.6 +2:24.1+2620,00%3,68%57
338 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:29.6 +2:24.1+2620,00%3,68%23
339 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:29.7 +2:24.2+2621,82%3,67%76
340 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:29.7 +2:24.2+2621,82%3,67%17
341 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:29.7 +2:24.2+2621,82%3,67%87
342 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:29.9 +2:24.4+2625,45%3,67%18
343 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:30.0 +2:24.5+2627,27%3,67%58
344 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:30.0 +2:24.5+2627,27%3,67%8
345 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:30.0 +2:24.5+2627,27%3,67%62
346 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:30.1 +2:24.6+2629,09%3,66%23
347 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:30.2 +2:24.7+2630,91%3,66%35
348 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:30.2 +2:24.7+2630,91%3,66%3
349 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:30.3 +2:24.8+2632,73%3,66%53
350 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:30.3 +2:24.8+2632,73%3,66%1
351 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:30.5 +2:25.0+2636,36%3,65%78
352 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:30.6 +2:25.1+2638,18%3,65%94
353 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:30.7 +2:25.2+2640,00%3,65%93
354 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:30.8 +2:25.3+2641,82%3,65%21
355 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 K 2:30.8 +2:25.3+2641,82%3,65%59
356 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:30.8 +2:25.3+2641,82%3,65%118
357 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:30.9 +2:25.4+2643,64%3,64%7
358 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:31.0 +2:25.5+2645,45%3,64%48
359 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:31.0 +2:25.5+2645,45%3,64%30
360 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:31.1 +2:25.6+2647,27%3,64%5
361 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:31.2 +2:25.7+2649,09%3,64%31
362 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:31.2 +2:25.7+2649,09%3,64%34
363 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:31.3 +2:25.8+2650,91%3,64%45
364 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:31.5 +2:26.0+2654,55%3,63%98
365 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:31.5 +2:26.0+2654,55%3,63%16
366 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:31.6 +2:26.1+2656,36%3,63%16
367 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:31.6 +2:26.1+2656,36%3,63%50
368 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:31.7 +2:26.2+2658,18%3,63%20
369 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:31.7 +2:26.2+2658,18%3,63%7
370 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:31.7 +2:26.2+2658,18%3,63%75
371 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:31.8 +2:26.3+2660,00%3,62%4
372 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:31.9 +2:26.4+2661,82%3,62%49
373 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:32.0 +2:26.5+2663,64%3,62%14
374 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:32.0 +2:26.5+2663,64%3,62%96
375 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:32.0 +2:26.5+2663,64%3,62%6
376 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:32.1 +2:26.6+2665,45%3,62%91
377 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:32.2 +2:26.7+2667,27%3,61%11
378 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:32.2 +2:26.7+2667,27%3,61%103
379 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:32.3 +2:26.8+2669,09%3,61%6
380 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:32.4 +2:26.9+2670,91%3,61%11
381 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:32.5 +2:27.0+2672,73%3,61%19
382 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:32.5 +2:27.0+2672,73%3,61%2
383 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:32.6 +2:27.1+2674,55%3,60%7
384 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:32.6 +2:27.1+2674,55%3,60%102
385 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:32.6 +2:27.1+2674,55%3,60%115
386 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:32.6 +2:27.1+2674,55%3,60%96
387 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:32.7 +2:27.2+2676,36%3,60%3
388 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:32.7 +2:27.2+2676,36%3,60%17
389 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:32.8 +2:27.3+2678,18%3,60%9
390 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:32.8 +2:27.3+2678,18%3,60%85
391 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:33.1 +2:27.6+2683,64%3,59%51
392 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:33.2 +2:27.7+2685,45%3,59%54
393 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:33.3 +2:27.8+2687,27%3,59%83
394 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:33.3 +2:27.8+2687,27%3,59%12
395 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:33.3 +2:27.8+2687,27%3,59%40
396 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:33.3 +2:27.8+2687,27%3,59%95
397 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:33.4 +2:27.9+2689,09%3,59%67
398 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:33.6 +2:28.1+2692,73%3,58%108
399 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:33.6 +2:28.1+2692,73%3,58%105
400 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:33.7 +2:28.2+2694,55%3,58%104
401 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:33.9 +2:28.4+2698,18%3,57%15
402 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:34.0 +2:28.5+2700,00%3,57%11
403 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:34.0 +2:28.5+2700,00%3,57%7
404 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:34.0 +2:28.5+2700,00%3,57%99
405 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:34.1 +2:28.6+2701,82%3,57%5
406 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:34.2 +2:28.7+2703,64%3,57%114
407 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:34.2 +2:28.7+2703,64%3,57%39
408 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:34.3 +2:28.8+2705,45%3,56%42
409 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:34.4 +2:28.9+2707,27%3,56%26
410 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:34.5 +2:29.0+2709,09%3,56%10
411 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.5 +2:29.0+2709,09%3,56%12
412 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.6 +2:29.1+2710,91%3,56%2
413 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712,73%3,56%59
414 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712,73%3,56%96
415 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712,73%3,56%113
416 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712,73%3,56%48
417 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:34.8 +2:29.3+2714,55%3,55%14
418 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.8 +2:29.3+2714,55%3,55%13
419 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:34.8 +2:29.3+2714,55%3,55%17
420 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:34.8 +2:29.3+2714,55%3,55%41
421 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:34.9 +2:29.4+2716,36%3,55%12
422 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:35.0 +2:29.5+2718,18%3,55%101
423 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:35.2 +2:29.6+2720,00%3,54%15
424 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:35.2 +2:29.7+2721,82%3,54%8
425 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:35.3 +2:29.8+2723,64%3,54%4
426 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:35.3 +2:29.8+2723,64%3,54%25
427 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:35.4 +2:29.9+2725,45%3,54%25
428 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 K 2:35.4 +2:29.9+2725,45%3,54%58
429 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:35.4 +2:29.9+2725,45%3,54%84
430 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:35.4 +2:29.9+2725,45%3,54%110
431 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:35.5 +2:30.0+2727,27%3,54%18
432 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:35.6 +2:30.1+2729,09%3,53%35
433 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:35.6 +2:30.1+2729,09%3,53%37
434 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:35.6 +2:30.1+2729,09%3,53%3
435 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:35.6 +2:30.1+2729,09%3,53%9
436 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:35.7 +2:30.2+2730,91%3,53%21
437 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 K 2:35.7 +2:30.2+2730,91%3,53%53
438 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:35.7 +2:30.2+2730,91%3,53%43
439 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:35.8 +2:30.3+2732,73%3,53%10
440 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 K 2:35.8 +2:30.3+2732,73%3,53%55
441 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:35.9 +2:30.4+2734,55%3,53%12
442 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736,36%3,53%24
443 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736,36%3,53%50
443 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 K 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736,36%3,53%56
443 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736,36%3,53%59
446 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:36.2 +2:30.7+2740,00%3,52%27
447 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:36.2 +2:30.7+2740,00%3,52%112
448 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:36.3 +2:30.8+2741,82%3,52%26
449 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:36.3 +2:30.8+2741,82%3,52%6
450 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:36.4 +2:30.8+2741,82%3,52%11
451 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:36.4 +2:30.9+2743,64%3,52%3
451 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:36.4 +2:30.9+2743,64%3,52%14
453 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:36.4 +2:30.9+2743,64%3,52%109
454 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:36.5 +2:31.0+2745,45%3,51%8
455 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:36.6 +2:31.1+2747,27%3,51%15
456 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:36.6 +2:31.1+2747,27%3,51%23
457 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:36.6 +2:31.1+2747,27%3,51%43
458 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:36.7 +2:31.2+2749,09%3,51%21
459 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:36.8 +2:31.3+2750,91%3,51%20
460 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:36.9 +2:31.4+2752,73%3,51%22
461 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:36.9 +2:31.4+2752,73%3,51%22
462 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:37.1 +2:31.6+2756,36%3,50%16
463 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:37.1 +2:31.6+2756,36%3,50%19
464 34 Jennifer Liechti Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 42 K 2:37.2 +2:31.7+2758,18%3,50%57
465 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:37.2 +2:31.7+2758,18%3,50%16
466 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:37.2 +2:31.7+2758,18%3,50%23
467 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:37.2 +2:31.7+2758,18%3,50%59
468 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760,00%3,50%13
469 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760,00%3,50%58
470 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760,00%3,50%1
470 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760,00%3,50%15
472 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:37.5 +2:32.0+2763,64%3,49%2
473 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:37.7 +2:32.2+2767,27%3,49%71
474 3 Maylyn Booher Pleasant Grove, UT  30 to 34 30 K 2:37.7 +2:32.2+2767,27%3,49%38
475 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:37.8 +2:32.3+2769,09%3,49%8
476 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 K 2:37.8 +2:32.3+2769,09%3,49%55
477 38 Theresa Peterson Park City, UT  50 to 54 50 K 2:37.9 +2:32.4+2770,91%3,48%13
478 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:38.0 +2:32.5+2772,73%3,48%22
479 44 Sue Raymond Midvale, UT  55 to 59 56 K 2:38.1 +2:32.6+2774,55%3,48%28
480 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:38.1 +2:32.6+2774,55%3,48%31
481 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:38.1 +2:32.6+2774,55%3,48%25
482 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:38.2 +2:32.7+2776,36%3,48%47
483 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:38.3 +2:32.8+2778,18%3,47%37
484 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:38.3 +2:32.8+2778,18%3,47%3
484 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:38.3 +2:32.8+2778,18%3,47%16
486 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:38.4 +2:32.9+2780,00%3,47%6
487 26 Leslie Howlett Lehi, UT  35 to 39 39 K 2:38.7 +2:33.2+2785,45%3,47%57
488 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:38.7 +2:33.2+2785,45%3,47%60
489 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:38.7 +2:33.2+2785,45%3,47%31
490 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:38.8 +2:33.3+2787,27%3,46%30
491 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:38.8 +2:33.3+2787,27%3,46%55
492 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:38.8 +2:33.3+2787,27%3,46%5
493 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:39.0 +2:33.5+2790,91%3,46%76
494 61 Dawn Westrum Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:39.0 +2:33.5+2790,91%3,46%57
495 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:39.1 +2:33.6+2792,73%3,46%36
496 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:39.1 +2:33.6+2792,73%3,46%22
497 22 Camille Harvey Taylorsville, UT  45 to 49 49 K 2:39.1 +2:33.6+2792,73%3,46%45
498 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:39.3 +2:33.8+2796,36%3,45%18
499 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:39.4 +2:33.9+2798,18%3,45%26
500 59 Katja Vigil Salt Lake City, UT  40 to 44 44 K 2:39.4 +2:33.9+2798,18%3,45%21
Side / 5
Racers per side: