2020 Provo Santa Run

Saturday, December 12, 2020 4:01 PM (GMT-7) - Final results

Race info

Sport:	Running
Location:	Provo, UT, United States
Start type:	Individual start
Racers:	104
Category results:	Exclude top 3 overall
Timed on:	OnePlus ONEPLUS A6013
Timed with:	Webscorer PRO 4.5
Updated:	Monday, February 22, 2021 11:34 AM (GMT-7)

Organized by:	On Hill Events
Race website:	http://www.onhillevents.com

Contact organizer

Use this form to send an email to the organizer.

Your name
Your email address
Confirm email address

Message to organizer
Send

2020 Provo Santa Run view larger image View larger photo

PHOTO
MAP

Race winners »
5K Female - Overall

Place	Bib	Name Affiliation	Category	Age	Gender	Finish time
1	169	WalkerProvo - UT	Female 20 to 24	22	F	25:36.7	--100%39.19%37.23%16:04:25.2
2	170	WalkerProvo - UT	Female 20 to 24	20	F	25:40.5	+0:03.8+0.25%99.75%39.04%37.07%16:04:25.2
3	33	DangerfieldTooele - UT	Female 10 to 14	13	F	26:37.6	+1:00.9+3.96%96.19%36.78%34.74%16:03:22.2
4	13	BerlinOrem - UT	Female 25 to 29	26	F	26:39.2	+1:02.5+4.07%96.09%36.71%34.67%16:03:05.0
5	32	DangerfieldTooele - UT	Female 10 to 14	10	F	26:44.0	+1:07.3+4.38%95.80%36.52%34.48%16:03:22.2
6	82	HuntProvo - UT	Female 20 to 24	21	F	28:58.5	+3:21.8+13.13%88.39%31.20%28.98%16:05:02.1
7	93	LoertscherProvo - UT	Female 20 to 24	23	F	29:03.1	+3:26.4+13.43%88.16%31.02%28.79%16:08:13.4
8	70	HeapOgden - UT	Female 15 to 19	16	F	29:18.3	+3:41.6+14.42%87.40%30.42%28.17%16:09:00.3
9	122	OliverosRiverton - UT	Female 25 to 29	26	F	30:05.9	+4:29.2+17.52%85.09%28.53%26.23%16:05:02.1
10	44	G. PeckLayton - UT	Female 45 to 49	45	F	30:54.1	+5:17.4+20.65%82.88%26.63%24.26%16:09:21.1
11	183	HillsteadNA - UT	Female 35 to 39	37	F	31:24.0	+5:47.3+22.60%81.57%25.44%23.04%16:05:22.1
12	182	BeanNA - UT	Female 35 to 39	35	F	31:24.7	+5:48.0+22.65%81.54%25.41%23.01%16:05:22.1
13	36	ElmerSpringville - UT	Female 40 to 44	44	F	31:33.4	+5:56.7+23.21%81.16%25.07%22.65%16:04:43.6
14	117	nadsadyProvo - UT	Female 30 to 34	32	F	31:39.0	+6:02.3+23.58%80.92%24.85%22.42%16:12:43.6
15	162	TillettKamas - UT	Female 45 to 49	49	F	31:39.8	+6:03.1+23.63%80.89%24.82%22.39%16:06:31.0
16	163	TillettKamas - UT	Female 15 to 19	19	F	32:06.4	+6:29.7+25.36%79.77%23.76%21.31%16:06:31.0
17	188	ThatcherNA - UT	Female 20 to 24	22	F	33:10.4	+7:33.7+29.52%77.21%21.23%18.69%16:05:30.3
18	95	LuckeNorth Salt Lake - UT	Female 55 to 59	57	F	33:25.3	+7:48.6+30.49%76.63%20.64%18.08%16:05:36.5
19	62	HammondPleasant Grove - UT	Female 25 to 29	27	F	33:27.3	+7:50.6+30.62%76.56%20.56%18.00%16:07:30.9
20	58	GillisProvo - UT	Female 30 to 34	31	F	33:46.6	+8:09.9+31.88%75.83%19.80%17.21%16:16:53.9
21	75	HowarthSpanish Fork - UT	Female 20 to 24	23	F	34:10.5	+8:33.8+33.44%74.94%18.85%16.24%16:15:23.5
22	17	BoneMapleton - UT	Female 50 to 54	50	F	34:39.6	+9:02.9+35.33%73.89%17.70%15.05%16:09:39.5
23	1	AndersonProvo - UT	Female 30 to 34	34	F	34:51.2	+9:14.5+36.08%73.48%17.24%14.57%16:16:23.3
24	165	TurnerLehi - UT	Female 15 to 19	15	F	35:15.0	+9:38.3+37.63%72.66%16.30%13.60%16:08:02.4
25	166	TurnerLehi - UT	Female 35 to 39	37	F	35:16.6	+9:39.9+37.74%72.60%16.24%13.54%16:08:02.4
26	14	BinghamSpringville - UT	Female 15 to 19	17	F	35:56.6	+10:19.9+40.34%71.26%14.65%11.90%16:09:51.8
27	98	McClainProvo - UT	Female 20 to 24	22	F	35:59.0	+10:22.3+40.50%71.18%14.56%11.80%16:09:51.8
28	15	BinghamSpringville - UT	Female 10 to 14	13	F	36:01.0	+10:24.3+40.63%71.11%14.48%11.72%16:09:51.8
29	84	JohnsonMapleton - UT	Female 45 to 49	46	F	36:40.8	+11:04.1+43.22%69.82%12.91%10.10%16:06:48.7
30	156	ThatcherKaysville - UT	Female 50 to 54	51	F	37:07.9	+11:31.2+44.98%68.98%11.83%8.99%16:14:42.2
31	73	HobanTooele - UT	Female 40 to 44	42	F	37:39.2	+12:02.5+47.02%68.02%10.59%7.71%16:07:47.1
32	127	PaskvanTooele - UT	Female 45 to 49	48	F	37:40.1	+12:03.4+47.07%67.99%10.56%7.67%16:07:47.1
33	159	ThomSalt Lake City - UT	Female 45 to 49	49	F	38:24.8	+12:48.1+49.98%66.67%8.79%5.85%16:11:30.9
34	131	PittsAmerican Fork - UT	Female 25 to 29	29	F	38:37.8	+13:01.1+50.83%66.30%8.28%5.32%16:07:21.9
35	111	MontgomeryAmerican Fork - UT	Female 25 to 29	29	F	38:38.4	+13:01.7+50.87%66.28%8.25%5.29%16:07:21.9
36	65	HannemannOrem - UT	Female 25 to 29	27	F	38:48.7	+13:12.0+51.54%65.99%7.84%4.87%16:08:25.4
37	87	JohnstonOrem - UT	Female 50 to 54	52	F	38:50.0	+13:13.3+51.62%65.95%7.79%4.82%16:08:25.4
38	16	BoneDraper - UT	Female 25 to 29	26	F	39:11.0	+13:34.3+52.99%65.36%6.96%3.96%16:09:39.5
39	140	RowleyOrem - UT	Female 50 to 54	53	F	39:53.3	+14:16.6+55.74%64.21%5.29%2.23%16:04:36.8
40	143	SchmidtProvo - UT	Female 20 to 24	20	F	40:47.6	+15:10.9+59.28%62.78%3.14%0.01%16:12:03.3
41	5	BaileyProvo - UT	Female 45 to 49	48	F	40:48.3	+15:11.6+59.32%62.77%3.11%-0.01%16:08:38.7
42	129	PectolProvo - UT	Female 45 to 49	47	F	40:54.6	+15:17.9+59.73%62.60%2.86%-0.27%16:08:38.7
43	180	ZimmermanHeber City - UT	Female 60 to 64	61	F	42:42.2	+17:05.5+66.73%59.98%-1.40%-4.67%16:05:59.5
44	181	ZimmermanHerriman - UT	Female 25 to 29	26	F	42:42.6	+17:05.9+66.76%59.97%-1.41%-4.68%16:05:59.5
45	9	BartholomewAlpine - UT	Female 40 to 44	42	F	43:16.5	+17:39.8+68.97%59.18%-2.75%-6.07%16:14:50.4
46	45	GaddProvo - UT	Female 45 to 49	45	F	44:13.6	+18:36.9+72.68%57.91%-5.01%-8.40%16:15:15.2
47	60	GuzmanProvo - UT	Female 25 to 29	28	F	44:58.4	+19:21.7+75.60%56.95%-6.79%-10.23%16:10:04.8
48	174	WillardsenOrem - UT	Female 20 to 24	21	F	45:05.1	+19:28.4+76.03%56.81%-7.05%-10.50%16:09:31.2
49	168	TyackeOrem - UT	Female 50 to 54	54	F	45:07.0	+19:30.3+76.16%56.77%-7.13%-10.58%16:09:31.2
50	138	RollinsSaratoga Springs - UT	Female 10 to 14	10	F	45:43.5	+20:06.8+78.53%56.01%-8.57%-12.07%16:14:20.5
51	37	EvansHerriman - UT	Female 45 to 49	47	F	45:44.8	+20:08.1+78.62%55.99%-8.62%-12.13%16:11:30.9
52	137	RollinsSaratoga Springs - UT	Female 30 to 34	32	F	45:46.1	+20:09.4+78.70%55.96%-8.67%-12.18%16:14:20.5
53	78	HughesWoodland Hills - UT	Female 65 to 69	69	F	45:50.4	+20:13.7+78.98%55.87%-8.84%-12.36%16:10:55.1
54	139	rowettOrem - UT	Female 30 to 34	30	F	46:01.7	+20:25.0+79.72%55.64%-9.29%-12.82%16:06:42.1
55	92	KranwinkleSalt Lake City - UT	Female 40 to 44	42	F	46:51.4	+21:14.7+82.95%54.66%-11.26%-14.85%16:08:52.0
56	2	ApplegateFarmington - NM	Female 20 to 24	24	F	47:27.6	+21:50.9+85.31%53.96%-12.69%-16.33%16:11:52.3
57	132	PlowmanPleasant Grove - UT	Female 35 to 39	39	F	47:30.2	+21:53.5+85.48%53.92%-12.79%-16.43%16:10:12.3
58	67	HarveySouth Jordan - UT	Female 10 to 14	14	F	47:45.5	+22:08.8+86.47%53.63%-13.40%-17.06%16:12:28.9
59	97	MarkiewiczPayson - UT	Female 40 to 44	40	F	47:54.1	+22:17.4+87.03%53.47%-13.74%-17.41%16:14:55.1
60	142	SaavedraLehi - UT	Female 35 to 39	38	F	48:16.9	+22:40.2+88.51%53.05%-14.64%-18.34%16:06:42.1
61	50	GeeThatcher - ID	Female 35 to 39	38	F	50:13.1	+24:36.4+96.08%51.00%-19.24%-23.09%16:15:07.0
62	53	GefromSantee - CA	Female 35 to 39	36	F	50:25.6	+24:48.9+96.89%50.79%-19.74%-23.60%16:09:21.1
63	135	RobertsPayson - UT	Female 25 to 29	25	F	51:00.6	+25:23.9+99.17%50.21%-21.12%-25.03%16:10:41.5
64	3	ApplegateFarmington - NM	Female 55 to 59	57	F	51:30.9	+25:54.2+101.14%49.72%-22.32%-26.26%16:11:52.3
65	173	WhitemanHeber City - UT	Female 40 to 44	42	F	51:35.7	+25:59.0+101.45%49.64%-22.51%-26.46%16:08:46.1
66	43	FuggentLive Oak - TX	Female 35 to 39	36	F	52:34.7	+26:58.0+105.29%48.71%-24.84%-28.87%16:16:46.4
67	189	ConkNA - UT	Female 35 to 39	39	F	52:35.2	+26:58.5+105.32%48.70%-24.86%-28.89%16:14:42.2
68	110	MechamSalt Lake City - UT	Female 10 to 14	12	F	53:59.1	+28:22.4+110.78%47.44%-28.18%-32.32%16:16:00.9
69	109	MechamSalt Lake City - UT	Female 30 to 34	33	F	53:59.5	+28:22.8+110.81%47.44%-28.20%-32.34%16:16:00.9
70	107	MechamSalt Lake City - UT	Female 10 to 14	10	F	54:00.3	+28:23.6+110.86%47.42%-28.23%-32.37%16:16:00.9
71	61	HaittOrem - UT	Female 10 to 14	10	F	57:17.6	+31:40.9+123.70%44.70%-36.04%-40.43%16:13:21.4
72	176	WittOrem - UT	Female 10 to 14	11	F	57:21.3	+31:44.6+123.94%44.65%-36.19%-40.58%16:13:21.4
73	147	ScottPayson - UT	Female 30 to 34	34	F	57:41.4	+32:04.7+125.25%44.40%-36.98%-41.40%16:10:41.5
74	146	ScottPayson - UT	Female 10 to 14	10	F	57:42.0	+32:05.3+125.29%44.39%-37.01%-41.42%16:10:41.5
75	79	HulsePayson - UT	Female 25 to 29	29	F	58:22.9	+32:46.2+127.95%43.87%-38.62%-43.10%16:10:41.5
76	38	FarleyPayson - UT	Female 55 to 59	55	F	58:23.5	+32:46.8+127.99%43.86%-38.65%-43.12%16:10:41.5
77	77	HughesPayson - UT	Female 25 to 29	26	F	1:00:01.8	+34:25.1+134.39%42.66%-42.54%-47.14%16:12:55.2
78	171	WellsSalem - UT	Female 25 to 29	26	F	1:00:06.4	+34:29.7+134.68%42.61%-42.72%-47.32%16:12:55.2
79	99	McCormickOrem - UT	Female 40 to 44	41	F	1:03:01.4	+37:24.7+146.07%40.64%-49.65%-54.47%16:11:21.3
80	100	McCormickOrem - UT	Female 10 to 14	10	F	1:04:55.5	+39:18.8+153.50%39.45%-54.16%-59.13%16:11:21.3
-	23	CallMidway - UT	Female 20 to 24	24	F	DNF	-----
-	25	CallRoy - UT	Female 10 to 14	14	F	DNF	-----
-	27	CallMidway - UT	Female 55 to 59	55	F	DNF	-----16:46:46.6
-	30	CallRoy - UT	Female 50 to 54	53	F	DNF	-----
-	39	FindleyTooele - UT	Female 30 to 34	31	F	DNF	-----16:05:11.3
-	41	Frazerbuffdale - UT	Female 35 to 39	35	F	DNF	-----
-	71	HigginsonSalem - UT	Female 15 to 19	15	F	DNF	-----
-	72	HigginsonSalem - UT	Female 45 to 49	48	F	DNF	-----
-	74	HoganPleasant Grove - UT	Female 30 to 34	34	F	DNF	-----
-	83	JohnsonSpanish Fork - UT	Female 30 to 34	32	F	DNF	-----
-	91	KennedyPleasant view - UT	Female 25 to 29	25	F	DNF	-----
-	96	MacDonaldProvo - UT	Female 40 to 44	40	F	DNF	-----
-	116	MortensenVineyard - UT	Female 65 to 69	65	F	DNF	-----
-	123	OlsenSpringville - UT	Female 60 to 64	63	F	DNF	-----
-	125	ParkinsonRiverton - UT	Female 35 to 39	36	F	DNF	-----
-	128	PeacockSouth Jordan - UT	Female 20 to 24	22	F	DNF	-----
-	130	PfeiferProvo - UT	Female 70 to 74	72	F	DNF	-----
-	136	RollinsSaratoga Springs - UT	Female 5 to 9	9	F	DNF	-----16:14:20.5
-	150	SmithEagle Mountain - UT	Female 10 to 14	14	F	DNF	-----
-	151	SmithEagle Mountain - UT	Female 10 to 14	12	F	DNF	-----
-	152	SmithEagle Mountain - UT	Female 15 to 19	16	F	DNF	-----
-	153	SmithEagle Mountain - UT	Female 45 to 49	48	F	DNF	-----
-	177	WorthingtonSalt Lake City - UT	Female 55 to 59	59	F	DNF	-----
-	1501	AllemEagle Mountain - UT	Female 25 to 29	29	F	DNF	-----