2023 Revolution Run

Saturday, December 31, 2022 7:59 AM (GMT-7) - Final results

Race info
Sport: Running
Location: Kearns, UT, United States
Start type: Manual wave start
Wave grouping: By distance
Racers: 20
Laps: Time-limited
Timed on: LENOVO 82BH
Timed with: Webscorer PRO 6.0
Chip timing: RFID - LLRP
Updated: Tuesday, January 3, 2023 12:56 PM (GMT-7)
Organized by: On Hill Events
Race website: http://www.onhillevents.com

Contact organizer

Use this form to send an email to the organizer.

Your name
Your email address
Confirm email address
Message to organizer
Send

  • Race winners »
  • Most Laps in 5 Hours Male
  • Lap times
Page / 6
Racers per page:
Place Bib Name Affiliation Category Age Gender Lap time
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%32
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%36
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%37
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%46
1 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.5 -+0.00%100.00%47
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1.82%98.21%28
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1.82%98.21%34
6 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.6 +0:00.1+1.82%98.21%41
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%26
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%31
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%42
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%43
9 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.7 +0:00.2+3.64%96.49%48
14 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:05.8 +0:00.3+5.45%94.83%38
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9.09%91.67%27
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9.09%91.67%35
15 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.0 +0:00.5+9.09%91.67%39
18 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.2 +0:00.7+12.73%88.71%30
19 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.3 +0:00.8+14.55%87.30%49
20 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:06.7 +0:01.2+21.82%82.09%25
21 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:07.0 +0:01.5+27.27%78.57%44
22 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:08.0 +0:02.5+45.45%68.75%45
23 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:08.3 +0:02.8+50.91%66.27%40
24 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:09.0 +0:03.5+63.64%61.11%29
25 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 0:45.0 +0:39.5+718.18%12.22%33
26 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.2 +0:54.7+994.55%9.14%49
27 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.6 +0:55.1+1001.82%9.08%45
28 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.7 +0:55.2+1003.64%9.06%42
29 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:00.8 +0:55.3+1005.45%9.05%19
30 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.0 +0:55.5+1009.09%9.02%48
31 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.3 +0:55.8+1014.55%8.97%43
32 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.5 +0:56.0+1018.18%8.94%44
32 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.5 +0:56.0+1018.18%8.94%46
34 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.6 +0:56.1+1020.00%8.93%51
35 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.7 +0:56.2+1021.82%8.91%58
35 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 1:01.7 +0:56.2+1021.82%8.91%66
37 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:01.8 +0:56.3+1023.64%8.90%50
38 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:02.6 +0:57.1+1038.18%8.79%61
39 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 1:03.7 +0:58.2+1058.18%8.63%50
40 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:04.1 +0:58.6+1065.45%8.58%47
41 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 1:04.2 +0:58.7+1067.27%8.57%95
42 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:06.4 +1:00.9+1107.27%8.28%6
43 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:08.2 +1:02.7+1140.00%8.06%64
44 81 Joshua Hansen   40 to 44 41 M 1:18.8 +1:13.3+1332.73%6.98%10
45 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:48.8 +1:43.3+1878.18%5.06%28
46 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:51.2 +1:45.7+1921.82%4.95%1
47 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:51.8 +1:46.3+1932.73%4.92%2
48 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 1:55.1 +1:49.6+1992.73%4.78%13
49 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:57.5 +1:52.0+2036.36%4.68%3
50 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 1:58.9 +1:53.4+2061.82%4.63%4
51 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:01.5 +1:56.0+2109.09%4.53%7
52 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.2 +1:56.7+2121.82%4.50%11
53 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.3 +1:56.8+2123.64%4.50%6
54 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:02.6 +1:57.1+2129.09%4.49%5
55 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:03.0 +1:57.5+2136.36%4.47%12
56 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:03.5 +1:58.0+2145.45%4.45%1
57 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:05.3 +1:59.8+2178.18%4.39%14
58 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:05.4 +1:59.9+2180.00%4.39%3
59 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:05.9 +2:00.4+2189.09%4.37%13
60 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:06.0 +2:00.5+2190.91%4.37%2
61 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:06.8 +2:01.3+2205.45%4.34%5
62 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:07.0 +2:01.5+2209.09%4.33%7
63 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.0 +2:01.5+2209.09%4.33%8
64 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.1 +2:01.6+2210.91%4.33%10
65 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:07.1 +2:01.6+2210.91%4.33%9
66 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:07.6 +2:02.1+2220.00%4.31%4
67 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:07.8 +2:02.3+2223.64%4.30%18
68 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:08.2 +2:02.7+2230.91%4.29%15
69 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.3 +2:02.8+2232.73%4.29%19
70 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.5 +2:03.0+2236.36%4.28%3
71 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:08.7 +2:03.2+2240.00%4.27%56
72 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:08.8 +2:03.3+2241.82%4.27%6
73 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:08.9 +2:03.4+2243.64%4.27%53
74 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.0 +2:03.5+2245.45%4.26%11
75 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:09.1 +2:03.6+2247.27%4.26%17
76 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.4 +2:03.9+2252.73%4.25%8
77 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:09.6 +2:04.1+2256.36%4.24%43
78 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:09.6 +2:04.1+2256.36%4.24%6
79 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.0 +2:04.5+2263.64%4.23%8
80 46 Monte Riding West Jordan, UT  45 to 49 49 M 2:10.1 +2:04.6+2265.45%4.23%31
81 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.3 +2:04.8+2269.09%4.22%24
82 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270.91%4.22%7
83 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.4 +2:04.9+2270.91%4.22%4
84 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.7 +2:05.2+2276.36%4.21%22
85 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:10.7 +2:05.2+2276.36%4.21%40
86 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.1 +2:05.6+2283.64%4.20%5
87 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.2 +2:05.7+2285.45%4.19%46
88 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.4 +2:05.9+2289.09%4.19%17
89 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.5 +2:06.0+2290.91%4.18%47
90 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292.73%4.18%23
91 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.6 +2:06.1+2292.73%4.18%21
92 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:11.7 +2:06.2+2294.55%4.18%20
93 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:11.8 +2:06.3+2296.36%4.17%14
94 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:11.9 +2:06.4+2298.18%4.17%23
95 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.2 +2:06.7+2303.64%4.16%11
96 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.3 +2:06.8+2305.45%4.16%32
97 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:12.4 +2:06.9+2307.27%4.15%23
98 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.4 +2:06.9+2307.27%4.15%48
99 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.5 +2:07.0+2309.09%4.15%28
100 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.6 +2:07.1+2310.91%4.15%21
101 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.7 +2:07.2+2312.73%4.14%15
102 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.9 +2:07.4+2316.36%4.14%41
103 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:12.9 +2:07.4+2316.36%4.14%29
104 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.2 +2:07.6+2320.00%4.13%19
105 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%33
106 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%24
107 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%22
108 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%9
109 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:13.3 +2:07.8+2323.64%4.13%18
110 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:13.4 +2:07.9+2325.45%4.12%23
111 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:13.9 +2:08.4+2334.55%4.11%9
112 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.0 +2:08.5+2336.36%4.10%12
113 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.0 +2:08.5+2336.36%4.10%36
114 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.1 +2:08.6+2338.18%4.10%17
115 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.2 +2:08.6+2338.18%4.10%10
116 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.2 +2:08.7+2340.00%4.10%25
117 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.2 +2:08.7+2340.00%4.10%14
118 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.5 +2:09.0+2345.45%4.09%13
119 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:14.5 +2:09.0+2345.45%4.09%10
120 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:14.6 +2:09.1+2347.27%4.09%16
121 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:14.6 +2:09.1+2347.27%4.09%10
122 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:14.7 +2:09.2+2349.09%4.08%2
123 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:15.0 +2:09.5+2354.55%4.07%25
124 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358.18%4.07%12
125 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358.18%4.07%42
126 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.2 +2:09.7+2358.18%4.07%1
127 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.3 +2:09.8+2360.00%4.07%38
128 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:15.7 +2:10.2+2367.27%4.05%9
129 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:15.7 +2:10.2+2367.27%4.05%13
130 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:15.9 +2:10.4+2370.91%4.05%34
131 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.0 +2:10.5+2372.73%4.04%20
132 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:16.1 +2:10.6+2374.55%4.04%26
133 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.1 +2:10.6+2374.55%4.04%6
134 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:16.3 +2:10.8+2378.18%4.04%102
135 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:16.4 +2:10.9+2380.00%4.03%8
136 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:16.5 +2:11.0+2381.82%4.03%37
137 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:17.1 +2:11.6+2392.73%4.01%13
138 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:17.2 +2:11.7+2394.55%4.01%12
139 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401.82%4.00%44
140 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401.82%4.00%11
141 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.6 +2:12.1+2401.82%4.00%16
142 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:17.7 +2:12.2+2403.64%3.99%4
143 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.8 +2:12.3+2405.45%3.99%30
144 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:17.8 +2:12.3+2405.45%3.99%31
145 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:17.9 +2:12.4+2407.27%3.99%7
146 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:18.5 +2:13.0+2418.18%3.97%21
147 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.3 +2:13.8+2432.73%3.95%5
148 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434.55%3.95%4
148 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:19.4 +2:13.9+2434.55%3.95%19
150 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:20.7 +2:15.2+2458.18%3.91%27
151 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:21.6 +2:16.1+2474.55%3.88%18
152 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:21.8 +2:16.3+2478.18%3.88%14
153 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:22.1 +2:16.6+2483.64%3.87%16
154 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:22.3 +2:16.8+2487.27%3.87%63
155 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:22.4 +2:16.9+2489.09%3.86%3
156 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:22.8 +2:17.3+2496.36%3.85%26
157 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:23.1 +2:17.6+2501.82%3.84%20
158 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:23.8 +2:18.3+2514.55%3.82%26
159 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:23.9 +2:18.4+2516.36%3.82%17
160 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.2 +2:18.7+2521.82%3.81%18
161 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.3 +2:18.8+2523.64%3.81%19
162 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.7 +2:19.2+2530.91%3.80%17
163 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:24.9 +2:19.4+2534.55%3.80%15
164 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:25.2 +2:19.7+2540.00%3.79%19
165 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:25.7 +2:20.2+2549.09%3.77%5
166 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:25.8 +2:20.3+2550.91%3.77%18
167 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:26.1 +2:20.6+2556.36%3.76%96
168 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:26.1 +2:20.6+2556.36%3.76%27
169 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:26.3 +2:20.8+2560.00%3.76%16
170 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:26.4 +2:20.9+2561.82%3.76%20
171 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:26.4 +2:20.9+2561.82%3.76%5
172 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:26.8 +2:21.3+2569.09%3.75%6
173 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:27.2 +2:21.7+2576.36%3.74%2
174 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:27.3 +2:21.8+2578.18%3.73%49
175 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:27.4 +2:21.9+2580.00%3.73%28
176 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:28.0 +2:22.5+2590.91%3.72%22
177 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:28.4 +2:22.9+2598.18%3.71%9
178 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:28.5 +2:23.0+2600.00%3.70%4
179 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601.82%3.70%29
180 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601.82%3.70%4
180 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:28.6 +2:23.1+2601.82%3.70%6
182 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:28.9 +2:23.4+2607.27%3.69%3
183 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:29.3 +2:23.8+2614.55%3.68%16
184 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:29.5 +2:24.0+2618.18%3.68%10
185 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:29.6 +2:24.1+2620.00%3.68%23
186 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:30.0 +2:24.5+2627.27%3.67%8
187 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:30.3 +2:24.8+2632.73%3.66%1
188 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:30.8 +2:25.3+2641.82%3.65%21
189 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:30.9 +2:25.4+2643.64%3.64%7
190 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:31.0 +2:25.5+2645.45%3.64%30
191 24 Christopher Hercules Magna, UT  15 to 19 16 M 2:31.2 +2:25.7+2649.09%3.64%31
192 27 James Howton Syracuse, UT  45 to 49 48 M 2:31.3 +2:25.8+2650.91%3.64%45
193 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:31.7 +2:26.2+2658.18%3.63%7
194 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:32.0 +2:26.5+2663.64%3.62%96
195 29 Cody Johnson Centerville, UT  30 to 34 31 M 2:32.0 +2:26.5+2663.64%3.62%6
196 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:32.2 +2:26.7+2667.27%3.61%11
197 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:32.5 +2:27.0+2672.73%3.61%2
198 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:32.7 +2:27.2+2676.36%3.60%3
199 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:33.3 +2:27.8+2687.27%3.59%12
200 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:34.0 +2:28.5+2700.00%3.57%11
201 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.5 +2:29.0+2709.09%3.56%12
202 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.6 +2:29.1+2710.91%3.56%2
203 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712.73%3.56%59
204 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:34.7 +2:29.2+2712.73%3.56%48
205 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:34.8 +2:29.3+2714.55%3.55%13
206 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:35.6 +2:30.1+2729.09%3.53%35
207 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:35.7 +2:30.2+2730.91%3.53%43
208 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736.36%3.53%50
208 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:36.0 +2:30.5+2736.36%3.53%59
210 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:36.2 +2:30.7+2740.00%3.52%27
211 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:36.4 +2:30.9+2743.64%3.52%3
212 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:36.9 +2:31.4+2752.73%3.51%22
213 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:37.2 +2:31.7+2758.18%3.50%16
214 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760.00%3.50%58
215 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760.00%3.50%1
215 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:37.3 +2:31.8+2760.00%3.50%15
217 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:37.8 +2:32.3+2769.09%3.49%8
218 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:38.1 +2:32.6+2774.55%3.48%31
219 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:38.1 +2:32.6+2774.55%3.48%25
220 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:38.2 +2:32.7+2776.36%3.48%47
221 18 Bryan Hadlock South Weber, UT  45 to 49 47 M 2:38.3 +2:32.8+2778.18%3.47%3
221 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:38.3 +2:32.8+2778.18%3.47%16
223 1 Connor Anderson Salt Lake City, UT  15 to 19 18 M 2:38.4 +2:32.9+2780.00%3.47%6
224 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:38.7 +2:33.2+2785.45%3.47%60
225 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:38.8 +2:33.3+2787.27%3.46%30
226 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:39.0 +2:33.5+2790.91%3.46%76
227 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:39.1 +2:33.6+2792.73%3.46%36
228 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:39.3 +2:33.8+2796.36%3.45%18
229 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:39.4 +2:33.9+2798.18%3.45%26
230 10 Beau Dennis West Jordan, UT  35 to 39 38 M 2:39.4 +2:33.9+2798.18%3.45%89
231 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:39.5 +2:34.0+2800.00%3.45%17
232 79 Michael Garrison Holladay, UT  50 to 54 54 M 2:39.5 +2:34.0+2800.00%3.45%9
233 115 Jonathan Crampton Pleasant Grove, UT  60 to 64 61 M 2:39.6 +2:34.1+2801.82%3.45%2
234 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:39.6 +2:34.1+2801.82%3.45%25
235 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:39.7 +2:34.2+2803.64%3.44%47
236 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:39.9 +2:34.4+2807.27%3.44%40
237 48 Chad Robison Draper, UT  55 to 59 57 M 2:39.9 +2:34.4+2807.27%3.44%21
238 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:39.9 +2:34.4+2807.27%3.44%24
239 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:40.0 +2:34.5+2809.09%3.44%39
240 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.0 +2:34.5+2809.09%3.44%38
241 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.2 +2:34.7+2812.73%3.43%13
242 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.5 +2:35.0+2818.18%3.43%33
243 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.5 +2:35.0+2818.18%3.43%50
244 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.5 +2:35.0+2818.18%3.43%20
245 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:40.6 +2:35.1+2820.00%3.42%50
246 21 James Harrison Ogden, UT  55 to 59 55 M 2:40.8 +2:35.2+2821.82%3.42%40
247 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:40.9 +2:35.4+2825.45%3.42%28
248 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:40.9 +2:35.4+2825.45%3.42%55
249 23 Ben Henderson No. Ogden, UT  60 to 64 62 M 2:40.9 +2:35.4+2825.45%3.42%44
250 16 Lawrence Gray Draper, UT  40 to 44 44 M 2:41.1 +2:35.6+2829.09%3.41%30
Page / 6
Racers per page: